Skip to main content

Full text of "The crimes of Khrushchev"

See other formats


cAT?. 


9335.4a365 


^ 


sJ 


THE  CRIMES  OF  KHRUSHCHEV 

PART  5 


CONSULTATIONS  WITH 
Mr.  Joseph  Pauco 
Father  Theodoric  Joseph  Zubek 
Mr.  Nuci  KoTTA 
Mr.  Arshi  Pipa 

COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

EIGHTY-SIXTH  CONGRESS 
FIRST  SESSION 


DECEMBER  17,  1959 
(INCLUDING  INDEX) 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 


UNITED  STATES 
GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 
48405"  WASHINGTON  :   1960 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
United  States  House  op  Representatives 

FRANCIS  E.  WALTER,  Pennsylvania,  Chairman 
MORGAN  M.  MOULDER,  Missouri  DONALD  L.  JACKSON,  California 

CLYDE  DOYLE,  California  GORDON  H.  SCHERER,  Ohio 

EDWESr  E,  WILLIS,  Louisiana  WILLIAM  E.  MILLER,  New  York 

WILLIAM  M.  TUCK,  Virginia  AUGUST  E.  JOHANSEN,  Michigan 

Richard  Arens,  Staff  Director 
II 


CONTENTS 


Page 

Synopsis _ 1 

December  17,  1959.     Testimony  of — 

Mr.  Joseph  Pauco 7 

Father  Theodoric  Joseph  Zubek 16 

Mr.  Nuci  Kotta _. 23 

Mr.  Arshi  Pipa 23 

Index i 

III 


Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress 

The  legislation  under  which  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  operates  is  Public  Law  601,  79th  Congress  [1946],  chapter 
753, 2d  session,  which  provides : 

Be  it  enacted  iy  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States 
of  America  in  Congress  assembled,  *  *  * 

PART  2— RULES  OF  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES 

Rule  X 

SEC.    121.   STANDING   COMMITTEES 

18.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 

Rule  XI 

POWERS   AND    DUTIES    OF   COMMITTEES 
O  *  *  4>  •  *  • 

(q)    (1)  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(A)   Un-American  activities. 

(2)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommit- 
tee, is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (i)  the  extent, 
character,  and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(ii)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  propa- 
ganda that  Is  Instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (Hi)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress  In 
any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  ( or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  In  session)  the  results  of  any  such 
investigation,  together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  Investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such 
times  and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting, 
has  recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  It  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member. 


Rule  XII 

LEGISLATIVE   OVERSIGHT   BY   STANDING   COMMITTEES 

Sec.  136.  To  assist  the  Congress  In  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws 
and  in  developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  It  may  deem  neces- 
sary, each  standing  committee  of  the  Senate  and  the  House  of  Representatives 
shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness  of  the  execution  by  the  administrative 
agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject  matter  of  which  Is  within  the  jurisdic- 
tion of  such  committee ;  and,  for  that  purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports 
and  data  submitted  to  the  Congress  by  the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of 
the  Government. 

IV 


RULES  ADOPTED  BY  THE  86TH  CONGRESS 

House  Resolution  7,  January  7,  1959 

*  *  *  «  *  *  * 

Rule  X 

STANDING   COMMITTEES 

1.  There  shall  be  elected  by  the  House,  at  the  commencement  of  each  Con- 
gress, 

(q)  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  to  consist  of  nine  Members. 
******* 

Rule  XI 

POWERS   AND   DUTIES    OF   COMMITTEES 

*  *  *  *  *  0  * 

18.  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

(a)  Un-American  activities. 

(b)  The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  as  a  whole  or  by  subcommittee, 
is  authorized  to  make  from  time  to  time  investigations  of  (1)  tlie  extent,  char- 
acter, and  objects  of  un-American  propaganda  activities  in  the  United  States, 
(2)  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States  of  subversive  and  un-American  prop- 
aganda that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries  or  of  a  domestic  origin  and 
attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by  our  Constitu- 
tion, and  (3)  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that  would  aid  Congress 
in  any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  shall  report  to  the  House  (or  to  the 
Clerk  of  the  House  if  the  House  is  not  in  session)  the  results  of  any  such  investi- 
gation, together  with  such  recommendations  as  it  deems  advisable. 

For  the  purpose  of  any  such  investigation,  the  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities,  or  any  subcommittee  thereof,  is  authorized  to  sit  and  act  at  such  times 
and  places  within  the  United  States,  whether  or  not  the  House  is  sitting,  has 
recessed,  or  has  adjourned,  to  hold  such  hearings,  to  require  the  attendance 
of  such  witnesses  and  the  production  of  such  books,  papers,  and  documents,  and 
to  take  such  testimony,  as  it  deems  necessary.  Subpenas  may  be  issued  under 
the  signature  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee  or  any  subcommittee,  or  by  any 
member  designated  by  any  such  chairman,  and  may  be  served  by  any  person 
designated  by  any  such  chairman  or  member.    "" 

******* 

26.  To  assist  the  House  in  appraising  the  administration  of  the  laws  and  in 
developing  such  amendments  or  related  legislation  as  it  may  deem  necessary, 
each  standing  committee  of  the  House  shall  exercise  continuous  watchfulness 
of  the  execution  by  the  administrative  agencies  concerned  of  any  laws,  the  subject 
matter  of  which  is  within  the  jurisdiction  of  such  committee;  and,  for  that 
purpose,  shall  study  all  pertinent  reports  and  data  submitted  to  the  House  by 
the  agencies  in  the  executive  branch  of  the  Government. 


The  best  way 

to  eliminate  war  is  the  gaining  of  power 

by  Communists 

all  over  the  world. 

Nikita  Khrushchev, 

addressing 

the  Third  International  Congress 

of    Miners   Unions 

in    Poland, 

July,  1959. 

VI 


THE  CRIMES  OF  KHRUSHCHEV 


SYNOPSIS 


Firsthand  accounts  of  Khrushchev's  horror-filled  subjugation  of  the 
people  of  the  country  formerly  known  as  Slovakia,  the  reign  of  terror 
under  which  these  people  are  presently  suffering,  and  the  inhumanities 
currently  being  inflicted  by  Khrushchev's  international  Communist 
apparatus  on  the  people  of  Albania  are  related  in  the  accompanying 
consultations  with  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities. 

SLOVAKIA 

Joseph  Pauco,  secretary-general  of  the  Slovak  National  Council 
Abroad,  describing  the  Communist  subjugation  of  Slovakia,  stated: 

Soviet  and  Czech  and  other  international  Communists, 
under  the  direction  of  Khrushchev  and  his  secret  police, 
swooped  down  by  the  thousands  out  of  the  mountains  and 
forests  upon  the  helpless  Slovak  population,  savagely  and 
shamelessly  butchering  them  and  destroying  their  homes, 
and  occupied  certain  strategic  public  centers  and  buildings, 
including  military  barracks,  and  proclaimed  a  violent  revolu- 
tion, the  aim  of  which,  according  to  the  proclamation,  was  to 
overthrow  Slovakia's  government  and  bind  Slovakia  to  Com- 
munist Prague  and  Moscow. 

The  partisans  terrorized  Slovak  villages.  They  categori- 
cally seized  all  citizens  of  note  who  had  shown  opposition  to 
communism.  They  robbed  their  apartments,  homes,  castles, 
factories,  places  of  business,  warehouses.  They  indulged  in 
drunken  orgies  and  began  to  annoy  innocent  victims,  tortur- 
ing and  killing  them.  Thousands  of  Slovaks  were  subjected 
to  unspeakable  tortures  and  inhuman  torments. 

:(:  4:  iH  9N  H: 

Toward  the  end  of  the  war  in  the  spring  of  1945  the  Soviet 
troops,  together  with  the  integrated  Czech  units  of  General 
Svoboda,  savagely  occupied  Slovakia  and  began  the  govern- 
ment of  the  so-called  People's  Democracy  under  the  control 
and  direction  of  Dr.  Eduard  Benes.  The  prisons  began  to 
overflow,  and  concentration  camps  began  to  spring  up  every- 
w^here.  In  the  first  month  this  "people's  democratic  gov- 
ernment" not  only  ruthlessly  incarcerated  political  opponents 
of  communism  and  Prague  centralism,  but  also  two  of  the 
Slovak  bishops  and  about  120  Catholic  priests.  It  opened  up 
the  so-called  peoples'  courts,  which  almost  daily  meted  out 
verdicts  of  death  and  frightful  punishment  against  justice 
and  freedom.  Thirty-seven  Slovaks  were  thusly  condemned 
and  executed  for  their  political  and  national  beliefs  and 
convictions. 


2  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

Regarding  the  concentration  camps  presently  in  operation  in  Slo- 
vakia, Mr.  Pauco  stated ; 

*  *  *  The  main  ones  are  at  Novaky,  Presov,  and  Mucenilry. 
Quite  a  few  hmidred  Slovak  political  internees  slave  in 
Jachymov,  the  well-known  ui'animn  mine  in  Sudetenland. 

With  respect  to  the  deplorable  economic  conditions,  Mr.  Pauco 
commented : 

Unlike  the  tremendous  prosperity,  the  high  standard  of 
living,  and  the  wonderful  life  and  freedom  which  so  glori- 
ously prevailed  during  Slovakia's  short-lived  independence 
under  President  Msgr.  Jozef  Tiso's  leadership,  and  which  the 
people  thoroughly  loved  and  enjoyed,  today  just  the  opposite 
exists.  Today  Slovakia's  economic  life  is  aligned  with,  and 
conforms  to,  that  of  the  Soviet  Union.  It  is  regimented  in 
accordance  with  the  whims  of  the  Czech-Communist  regime 
in  Prague.  It  is  thus  that  the  State  began  one  by  one  the  na- 
tionalization of  everything  and  is  establishing  complete  con- 
trol over  everything — public  and  personal,  economic  and 
social,  cultural,  and  even  religious  life.  It  has  established 
its  own  state  factories  and  industries;  its  own  utilities  and 
commercial  enterprises ;  its  own  state  housing,  hospitals,  and 
sanitoria ;  its  own  state-controlled  medical  and  other  profes- 
sions, trades,  and  classes ;  its  own  cultural,  social,  and  recrea- 
tional, even  religious  activities ;  its  own  state-owned  resources, 
forests,  land  and  waters;  and  its  own  state-owned  or  con- 
trolled communal  farms.  Thus  over  70  percent  of  the  farms 
in  Slovakia  are  already  communized,  that  is,  reduced  to  the 
kolkhoz  system,  and  farming. 

"The  Prague  Government  is  frantically  building  in  Slovakia  arms 
and  missile  mdustries  and  a  great  arsenal  of  atom  bombs,"  Mr.  Pauco 
warned.  Commenting  on  Khrushchev's  recent  tactics,  Mr.  Pauco 
concluded : 

They  are  overdone  and  sly.  Communists  have  always 
gone  after  their  objectives  well  thought  out  and  prepared. 
Today  it  isn't  necessary  for  them  to  proclaim  a  worldwide 
proletariat  revolution,  when  so  many  people  amongst  the 
Western  nations  seem  to  fancy  that  there  will  be  some  fa- 
vorable internal  changes  in  the  Soviet  regime.  Khrushchev 
shrewdly  casts  about  his  soothing  slogans,  and  we  are  encour- 
aged and  satisfied.  The  West  acts  as  if  it  had  discovered  that 
Khrushchev  in  this  war  of  nerves,  which  he  only  prolongs 
with  his  travels  and  visits,  is  achieving  above  all  that  which 
is  most  important  to  the  Soviet  Union — the  cracking  of  the 
backbone  of  the  subjugated  nations  behind  the  Iron  Curtain. 
Soviet  proi)aganda  can  now  contentedly  publicize  that  the 
West  is  not  concerned  about  these  subjugated  nations  and 
that  it  will  not  fight  in  their  behalf,  for  now  the  West  only 
desires  peace  and  comprc»iiise  with  Khrushchev. 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  3 

Father  Theodoric  Joseph  Zubek,  a  Franciscan  priest  who  escaped 
from  Slovakia,  testified  respecting  the  persecution  of  the  Catholic 
Church  there,  as  follows : 

*  *  *  Male  religious  orders  and  congregations  were  sup- 
pressed in  April  1950.  There  were  over  700  male  religious 
priests  and  brothers  living  in  137  monasteries  in  Slovakia. 
They  were  taken  forcibly  to  so-called  concentration  mona- 
steries and  were  subjected  to  Communist-sponsored  reeduca- 
tion. If  they  complied  with  this  brainwashing  and  took  the 
oath  of  loyalty,  they  were  sent  to  parishes  and  churches  as 
diocesan  priests.  If  they  remained  unyielding,  they  were  sent 
to  forced  labor  camps,  and  later  in  1957,  released  to  manual 
work.  Clerics  and  religious  brothers,  if  they  did  not  want 
to  leave  the  religious  life,  went  also  through  the  forced  labor 
camps,  and  eventually  to  manual  work  on  their  own.  A 
similar  fate  met  the  female  religious  congregations.  There 
were  3,548  religious  sisters  in  Slovakia,  living  in  210  con- 
vents. The  convents  were  suppressed  in  August,  1950,  and 
the  sisters  were  forced  to  leave  the  religious  life.  If  they 
refused,  they  were  sent  to  work  without  any  salary  in  forced 
labor  camps,  collective  farms,  or  various  state  plants. 

As  to  whether  the  persecution  of  the  Catholic  Church  has  been 
moderated  since  Khrushchev's  ascension  to  power,  Father  Zubek  re- 
plied : 

On  the  contrary,  in  the  last  2  years  the  Communists, 
particularly  in  Slovakia,  strengthened  their  efforts  to  elimi- 
nate religion  from  the  lives  of  the  populace,  Antireligious 
courses,  expositions,  and  publications  have  increased  consid- 
erably. The  antireligious  fight  is  considered  of  the  utmost 
importance,  particularly  in  Slovakia,  where  religion  is  deep- 
rooted  and  still  has  a  positive  influence  upon  the  anti-Com- 
munist stand  of  the  majority  of  the  populace. 

In  regard  to  the  manner  in  which  the  Communists  maintain  con- 
trol over  the  Catholic  Church  in  Slovakia,  Father  Zubek  stated : 

The  Communist  control  can  be  said  to  be  twofold :  public 
control  and  secret  control  of  activities  of  the  church.  By 
public  control,  I  mean  the  antichurch  laws  of  1949. 

Besides,  they  have  secret  control  of  the  church.  Spies  at- 
tend every  ceremony.  They  trail  priests  and  bishops  wher- 
ever they  go.  I  had  some  experience  along  that  line  myself. 
I  was  trailed  before  the  monasteries  were  suppressed.  I  saw 
people  shadowing  me  in  those  last  months.  I  was  also  a 
superior  of  a  monastery.  Each  individual  priest  did  not 
experience  this,  but  I,  being  the  head  of  a  monastery,  was  held 
responsible  for  all  proceedings  in  the  monastery,  and  when- 
ever I  left  the  door  of  the  monastery  I  always  had  someone 
shadowing  me. 


.48405  •— 60— pt.  &- 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 


ALBANIA 


Nuci  Kotta,  deputy  secretary-general  of  the  Assembly  of  Caj)tive 
European  Nations,  and  Arshi  Pipa,  former  author  and  instructor  in 
Albania,  described  collectivization  in  Albania  under  Khrushchev  as 
follows : 

Collectivization  in  Albania  started  in  earnest  in  1955; 
that  is,  when  Khrushchev  was  in  the  saddle  in  Russia.  It  was 
pursued  very  energetically,  and  by  1956,  30  percent  of  the 
arable  land  was  collectivized,  and  the  goal  of  the  five-year 
plan  which  is  to  end  next  year,  in  1960,  is  to  collectivize  over  80 
percent  of  the  land.  The  Communist  statistics  now  say  that 
about  75  percent  of  the  arable  land  is  collectivized.  The 
often  proclaimed  ultimate  ojective  is  the  collectivization  of 
100  percent  of  the  land. 

Mr.  Pipa  added : 

I  have  seen  indications  of  this  fact  myself.  I  was  living 
in  my  hometown  Shkoder  (Scutari)  in  September  1957, 
when  Premier  Shehu  came  personally  to  that  town  to  exert 
pressure  upon  the  peasants  of  the  Shkoder  district  to  enter 
the  collective  farms.  Shehu  went  to  a  village  near  Shkoder, 
gathered  the  peasants,  and  threatened  that,  were  they  not  to 
accept  collectivization,  they  would  be  considered  traitors  to 
the  country  and  dealt  with  accordingly.  After  that,  most 
of  the  peasants  entered  the  village  collective  farm.  It  is  only 
by  such  methods  that  communism  has  managed  to  collectivize 
the  free  Albanian  peasantry. 

"The  age  for  penal  responsibility  for  political  crimes  begins  at 
12,"  Mr.  Kotta  stated. 

In  regard  to  the  program  of  cultural  exchanges,  Mr.  Kotta  com- 
mented : 

The  Communist  fraud  in  the  whole  program  is  that  it 
purports  to  identify  in  the  minds  of  the  free  world  the 
Communist  regime  and  the  people  whom  they  hold  in  bond- 
age. You  do  not  see  in  any  of  these  cultural  exchanges,  in 
their  fairs,  in  their  motion  pictures,  in  their  art  work  which 
they  send  over  here,  in  their  ballets,  any  reference  at  all  to  the 
terror  mechanism  of  the  machinery  which  holds  in  bondage 
the  millions  of  people  that  the  Communists  have  subjugated. 
You  see  displayed  a  little  culture,  which  may  or  may  not  con- 
tain Communist  propaganda  as  such.  But  the  fallacy  of  the 
whole  program  is  that  it  tends  to  convey  to  the  minds  of  the 
free  world  the  concept  that  the  so-called  struggle  between  the 
free  world  and  the  Communist  world  is  a  struggle  between 
peoples  as  such,  that  is,  between  the  Russian  people  and  the 
American  people,  rather  than  between  a  deadly  Communist 
world  apparatus  and  the  remaining  free  people. 

t*  "p  !{•  !j!  ^ 

What  the  Kremlin  wants  is  to  lull  the  West  into  complac- 
ency. They  are  trying  to  get  the  West  to  recognize  the  status 
quo,  so  that  they  may  linally  succeed  in  convincing  the  captive 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  6 

peoples  throughout  the  Communist  empire  that  it  is  useless 
to  resist  them,  because  they  consider  that  the  resistance  of  the 
captive  nations  to  communism  is  one  of  the  major  deterrents 
to  their  plans  of  world  conquest. 

Mr.  Pipa,  who  served  10  years  in  slave  labor  camps  there,  stated  that 
the  Communists  have  installed  in  Albania  a  policy  of  forced  labor,  of 
prisons,  and  of  terrorism  which  is  strongly  opposed  by  the  peasants 
and  intellectuals.  He  further  stated  that  the  opposition  of  the  intel- 
lectual class  "has  been  repressed  with  a  seldom  paralleled  ferocity." 

Mr.  Pipa  continued : 

I  lived  in  Albania  under  Khrushchev's  rule  for  nearly  a  year 
and  a  half.  I  can,  therefore,  testify,  about  it.  My  opinion 
is  that  Albania  is  now  living  under  the  same  political  cli- 
mate as  that  of  Stalin.  The  best  evidence  of  this  is  that  the 
system  of  political  prisons  and  forced  labor  camps  is  the  same 
as  before. 

*  ♦  ♦  *  « 

Mr.  Pipa  further  said : 

I  could  testify  that  [in  Albania]  the  forced  collectivization 
policy  has  been  pursued  under  the  Khrushchev  period  with 
still  more  vigor  than  it  was  under  the  Stalin  regime. 

Commenting  on  the  reaction  of  the  people  of  Albania  to  compli- 
ments accorded  Khrushchev  during  his  visit  to  the  United  States,  Mr. 
Pipa  stated : 

I  would  say  they  would  be  shocked  at  hearing  it.  *  *  * 
When  Albanians  see,  for  instance,  that  sons  are  being  trained 
to  spy  on  their  own  parents,  they  would  be  much  perplexed  at 
the  presentation  of  a  person,  who  is  to  them  the  incarnation  of 
evil,  as  a  good  family  man. 


THE  CRIMES  OF  KHRUSHCHEV 
(Part  5) 


THURSDAY,   DECEMBER   17,   1959 

United  States  House  of  Representatives, 

Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  B.C. 
consultations 

The  following  consultations  began  at  10 :  30  a.m.  in  room  226,  Old 
House  Office  Building,  Washington,  D.C. 

Committee  members  present :  Hon.  Francis  E.  "Walter,  of  Pennsyl- 
vania (chairman)  presiding,  and  Hon.  Gordon  H.  Scherer,  of  Ohio. 

Staff  member  present :  Richard  Arens,  staff  director. 

The  Chairman.  The  committee  will  come  to  order  and  the  first 
witness  will  be  sworn. 

Do  you,  Mr.  Pauco,  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about 
to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth, 
so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  I  do. 

The  Chairman.  Proceed,  Mr.  Arens. 

STATEMENT  OF  JOSEPH  PATJCO 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself,  sir,  by  name,  residence,  and 
occupation. 

Mr.  Pauco.  Joseph  Pauco,  Mounted  Route,  Middletown,  Pa.  My 
occupation  is  that  of  journalist. 

]\Ir.  Arens.  Now  give  us,  please,  a  word  about  your  own  personal 
background. 

Mr.  Pauco.  I  was  born  in  Slovakia  on  February  26,  1914.  I  gradu- 
ated from  the  Slovak  University  in  Bratislava  in  1942  with  a  Ph.  D. 
degree,  after  which  I  worked  for  several  Slovak  newspapers.  I  was, 
in  the  years  1942-45,  editor  in  chief  of  the  daily  Slovak. 

In  April  1945, 1  escaped  with  my  wife  and  son  to  Austria.  I  lived 
for  2  years  in  Austria,  and  then  for  3  years  in  Munich,  Germany. 
Then,  in  April  1950  I  came  with  my  wife  to  the  United  States. 

Since  then,  I  have  been  Avorking  as  an  assistant  editor  of  the  weekly 
Jednota  in  INIiddletown,  Pa. 

Besides  that,  I  am  working  in  the  Slovak  liberation  movement,  and 
presently  I  am  secretary  general  of  the  Slovak  National  Council 
Abroad. 

I  have  written  several  books  in  Slovak  and  English,  most  of  them 
on  anti-Communist  topics. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  ? 

7 


8  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

Mr.  Pauco.  I  am,  since  1956. 

Mr.  Arens.  By  way  of  clarification  of  this  record,  please  tell  us  the 
location  and  political  status  of  your  former  homeland,  Slovakia. 

Mr.  Pauco.  Slovakia  is  a  country  between  the  Carpathian  Moun- 
tains and  the  Danube  River,  bordered  on  the  south  by  Hungary,  on  the 
north  by  Poland,  on  the  east  by  the  Subcarpathian  Ul^raine,  on  the 
west  by  Moravia. 

In  the  ninth  century  Slovalvia  was  an  independent  state,  a  kingdom, 
then  ruled  over  by  the  Hungarians.  It  was  part  of  the  Hungarian 
kingdom  for  almost  a  thousand  years,  until  1918.  Then,  in  1918, 
Czechoslovakia  was  created  from  two  lands,  Bohemia  and  Slovakia. 
Slovakia  was  the  eastern  part  of  Czechoslovakia. 

Then,  on  March  14, 1939,  Slovakia  declared  herself  independent.  In 
the  spring  of  1945,  Slovakia  was  overrun  by  the  Soviets  and  integrated 
again  with  Czechoslovakia,  which  is  still  enslaved  by  the  Communists. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  Khrushchev  directly  involved  in  the  enslavement 
of  Slovakia  and  its  people  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  It  certainly  is  true  to  say  that  Klirushchev  and  the 
Czech  Communists  destroyed  the  Slovak  Eepublic  and,  without  con- 
sulting the  Slovak  nation  or  its  people,  imposed  upon  it  the  brutal 
national  front. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  be  able  to  give  us  some  particulars  or  evi- 
dence of  this  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Indeed.  Let  me  show  you  this  Communist  newspaper, 
"Prace,"  printed  in  Bratislava,  Slovakia,  under  the  date  of  August 
6,  1959.  It  published,  as  you  can  perceive,  an  article  entitled,  "Lead- 
ing Role  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the  National  Uprising,"  in  which 
it  states,  among  other  things,  this : 

In  May  of  1944  Gottwald  arrived  at  the  partisan  head- 
quarters in  Kijev  [Kiev]  to  discuss  with  Klirushchev,  then 
head  of  the  Ukranian  (Soviet)  Government,  the  assistance 
needed  for  (organizing)  a  partisan  resistance  movement  in 
the  territories  of  (former)  Czecho-Slovakia.  In  accordance 
with  these  discussions,  segments  of  trained  paratrooj^s,  well 
experienced  in  organizing  partisan  movements,  were  dis- 
patched to  and  dropped  in  Slovakia  in  July  and  August  (of 
the  same  year)   *  *  *. 

This,  then,  was  the  beginning  of  the  savage  mission  undertaken 
against  the  Slovak  government  and  President  Msgr.  Jozef  Tiso,  a 
horror-filled  action  known  now  in  Slovakia  as  the  "August  Revolt." 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  in  this  "August  Revolt"  of  1944  ?  ^ 

Mr.  Pauco.  Soviet  and  Czech  and  other  international  Communists, 
under  the  direction  of  Khrushchev  and  his  secret  police,  swooped  down 
by  the  thousands  out  of  the  mountains  and  forests  upon  the  helpless 
Slovak  population,  savagely  and  shamelessly  butchering  them  and 
destroying  their  homes,  and  occupied  certain  strategic  public  centers 
and  buildmgs,  including  military  barracks,  and  proclaimed  a  violent 
revolution,  the  aim  of  which,  according  to  the  proclamation,  was  to 
overthrow  Slovakia's  government  and  bind  Slovakia  to  Communist 
Prague  and  Moscow. 

The  partisans  terrorized  Slovak  villages.  They  categorically  seized 
all  citizens  of  note  who  had  shown  opposition  to  conununism.  They 
robbed  their  apartments,  homes,  castles,  factories,  places  of  business, 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  9 

warehouses.  _  They  indulged  in  drunken  orgies  and  began  to  annoy 
innocent  victims,  torturing  and  killing  them.  Thousands  of  Slovaks 
were  subjected  to  unspeakable  tortures  and  inhuman  torments. 

Among  the  first  victims  in  this  wave  of  terror  was  the  Slovak  labor 
leader  and  Member  of  Parliament,  Francis  Slamen,  who  met  his  cruel 
fate  in  the  town  of  Brezno  nad  Hronom.  He  was  a  typical  Slovak 
laborer,  one  of  thousands  of  diligent  and  honest  Slovak  workingmen, 
providing  for  his  family  by  the  toil  of  his  hands. 

Another  notable  victim  of  the  partisans  was  a  Catholic  priest  and 
Parliamentary  deputy.  Rev.  Anthony  Salat,  who  died  in  the  first  week 
of  the  rebellion.  He  was  a  man  of  noble  character,  and  his  was  the 
stature  of  an  earnest  Slovak  patriot,  a  brilliant  popular  writer, 
a  matchless  public  speaker,  and  one  of  the  most  outspoken  and  deter- 
mined opponents  of  communism. 

They  dragged  him  out  of  the  quiet  of  his  parish  to  the  bridge  that 
spans  the  Hron  Eiver.  He  begged  to  be  allowed  to  make  his  con- 
fession, but  the  rabble  refused  liim  this  spiritual  consolation.  In 
answer  to  his  request  they  sounded  off  rounds  of  satanic  laughter  and 
piercing  ridicule  which  alternated  with  salvos  from  their  automatics, 
felling  the  good  priest  to  the  cold  pavement  of  the  bridge  that  he  had 
built  for  the  community. 

But  even  this  did  not  satisfy  the  savage  "liberators."  They  beset 
the  corpse  of  the  murdered  Father  Salat  and  robbed  it.  Out  of  his 
vest  pocket  they  removed  his  gold  watch ;  out  of  his  coat  pocket  they 
took  his  wallet.  They  even  knocked  out  several  of  his  teeth  and 
claimed  the  gold  caps  from  his  dental  work.  Then  they  hurled  the . 
brutally  abused  and  rifled  body  into  the  Hron. 

Father  Anthony  Salat  was  not  the  only  Slovak  Catholic  priest  done 
to  cruel  death  by  the  partisans.  Among  others  who  perished  under 
the  violent  hand  of  the  oppressors  were  Fathers  John  Nemec,  Martinka 
of  Liptovsky  Svaty  IVIikulas,  and  the  seminarian  Milan  of  Povazska 
Bystrica.  A  frightful  death  befell  Father  Seda,  the  pastor  in  Lip- 
tovsky Svaiy  Jan. 

Singled  out  for  sacrifice  were  also  a  number  of  valiant  officers  who 
chose  to  accept  no  command  in  the  uprising.  For  this  service  to  their 
country.  Colonels  Kanak  and  Zverin,  as  well  as  Lieutenant  Colonel 
Klucik  and  First  Lieutenants  Frecer  and  Sindler,  were  shot  to  death. 
The  distinguished  General  Turanec  was  put  under  house  arrest  in 
Banska  Bystrica  right  at  the  outset  of  the  putsch.  Once  they  let 
loose  the  full  strength  of  their  partisan  activities,  they  had  General 
Turanec  flown  to  Moscow,  where  they  tortured  him  for  his  uncom- 
promising stand  against  communism. 

One  of  the  major  stigmas  of  the  putsch  is  the  concentration  camp 
which  the  partisans  arranged  in  the  castle  fortress  Slovenska  Lupca. 
Here  they  tormented  and  persecuted  over  a  thousand  victims,  not  only 
men,  but  women  and  children,  too.  The  superintendent  of  this  con- 
centration camp  was  the  savage  Communist,  Staudinger. 

The  housing  of  the  prisoners  was  horrible.  The  overseer  packed 
over  150  people  into  a  single  room.  Other  sections  were  crowded  with 
as  niany  persons  as  could  possibly  be  forced  into  them.  Household 
furnishings  were  removed.  From  the  beginning,  the  prisoners  were 
bedded  on  the  bare  floor ;  later  the  authorities  allowed  them  to  bring 
in  some  straw.    Spies,  informers,  and  instigators  of  trouble  were 


10  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

planted  anions  the  prisoners.    Hygienic  requirements  in  this  concen- 
tration camp  became  a  thing  of  the  past.    The  place  was  a  real  hell. 

Inmates  took  sick  as  a  result  of  the  undernourishment,  starvation, 
filth,  and  foulness  that  prevailed.  Instead  of  providing  medical  help 
or  relief  for  them,  the  vindictive  jailer  turned  on  them  with  abuse  and 
embittered  their  lives  still  further  with  inhuman  treatment.  Even 
when  the  doctor  did  come  into  the  camp,  he  was  allowed  to  examine 
a  sick  unfortunate  only  in  the  presence  of  the  commandant  of  the  guard 
of  national  security.  The  physician  prescribed  medication  for  which 
the  prisoner  paid  but  never  received.  Their  daily  fare  consisted  of 
potatoes  and  cabbage. 

The  barbaric  superintendent,  a  former  shoemaker,  on  visiting  the 
confining  quarters,  abused  the  miserable  inmates  by  kicking  them  about 
like  do^s  while  he  cursed  them  fiendishly  and  threatened  every  one  of 
them  with  the  gallows. 

An  evil  reputation  came  to  be  associated  with  Kunerad,  one  of  the 
headquarters  of  the  partisan  band  located  near  the  city  Zilina.  Czech 
Karol  Bacilek  was  the  political  commissar  in  the  fortress  Kunerad. 
Brutal  in  the  extreme  was  the  punishment  meted  out  to  anti-com- 
munistic fighters,  and  quick  sentences  were  readily  executed.  It  was 
comparable  to  Sklabina,  headquarters  of  the  partisans. 

In  the  mass  grave  in  Podsucha,  there  were  found  80  victims  of 
partisan  ferocity.    In  the  mass  graves  near  Sklenne,  about  200  persons 
met  their  deaths.    Other  mass  graves  were  also  found  at  Kovacova,  in 
Pusty  Hrad,  in  the  Prievidza  Valley,  at  Humenne,  Lucivna,  Bosany, 
Lubietova,  Nemecka  Lupca  and  Kremnicka. 

During  this  Communist  putsch,  material  losses  in  Slovakia  were 
extremely  great.  The  state  statistical  and  planning  office  in 
Bratislava  published  in  its  "Statistical  Handbook  of  Slovakia  1947" 
an  evaluation  of  damage  inflicted  on  buildings,  projects,  and  their 
equipment,  art  objects,  communications,  livestock,  and  other  ravaged 
properties  as  in  excess  of  114,461,000,000  crowns,  or  $2.5  billion. 
Losses  in  lives  amounted  to  70,000. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  anything  to  add  to  this  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  I  was  in  Slovakia  at  the  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  after  this  "revolt"  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Toward  the  end  of  the  war  in  the  spring  of  1945  the 
Soviet  troops,  together  with  the  integrated  Czech  units  of  General 
Svoboda,  savagely  oc<3upied  Slovakia  and  began  the  government  of  the 
so-called  People's  Democracy  under  the  control  and  direction  of  Dr. 
Eduard  Benes.  The  prisons  began  to  overflow,  and  concentration 
camps  began  to  spring  up  everywhere.  In  the  first  month  this  "peo- 
ple's democratic  government"  not  only  ruthlessly  incarcerat-ed  politi- 
cal opponents  of  communism  and  Prague  centralism,  but  also  two  of 
the  Slovak  bishops  and  about  120  Catholic  priests.  It  opened  up  the 
so-called  peoples'  courts,  which  almost  daily  meted  out  verdicts  of 
death  and  frightful  punishment  against  justice  and  freedom.  Thirty- 
seven  Slovaks  were  thusly  condemned  and  executed  for  their  political 
and  national  beliefs  and  convictions.  Indeed,  every  person  seriously 
interested  or  involved  in  Slovak  politics  or  Slovakia's  freedom  and 
self-govermnent  or  independence,  if  not  condemned  outright  to  death, 
was  iriven  a  life  or  30-year  sentence.  On  April  18,  1947,  with  the 
gleeful  approval  of  Dr.  Benes,  Msgr.  Jozef  Tiso,  the  President  of 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  11 

Slovakia,  was  executed,  in  spite  of  the  pleas  of  the  bishops  of  Slovakia 
and  of  the  Vatican  itself.  The  premier  of  Slovakia,  Dr.  Vojtech 
Tuka,  was  likewise  executed. 

Until  1948  in  Slovakia  there  were  two  major  political  parties,  the 
Democratic  Party  and  the  Communist  Party,  which  outwardly  decided 
the  fate  of  the  Slovak  nation  and  of  the  anti-Communist  leaders,  and 
both  of  these  parties  acted  in  these  matters  in  unison,  as  one  in  a 
national  front.  Communists,  both  before  and  after  the  elections, 
which  were  in  May  of  1946  and  in  which  the  Communists  lost  out  in 
Slovakia,  were  assigned  the  leading  and  major  positions  in  the  so-called 
or  quasi  "Slovakia's  Autonomous  Govermnent"  (called  "Committee 
of  Commissioners") .  After  the  elections  Communist  Gustav  Husak 
became  the  head  of  this  "Slovak  Autonomous  Government,"  and  he 
filled  all  the  key  positions  with  his  followers,  Non-self  rule  and  sub- 
servience to  communism  in  this  so-called  "Democratic  Party"  became 
obvious.  Indeed,  already  in  the  same  year  of  1946  the  Democratic 
Party  succumbed  and  granted  its  power  and  authority  to  govern  to 
the  Communist  Party,  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  Slovak  nation 
voted  against  the  Communist  Party  and  elected  the  Democratic 
Party  into  power. 

Neither  the  Communist  Party  nor  its  Slovak  leaders,  however,  were 
able  to  enjoy  this  enviable  position  and  power  in  Slovakia,  for  both 
Gustav  Husak  and  his  closest  comrades  were  Slovak  nationalists,  who 
after  World  War  II  hoped  for  a  separate  Slovak  Soviet  Kepublic. 
The  Prague  rulers  of  the  dual  state  initiated  a  secret  and  unscrupulous 
purge  of  the  Slovak  Communist  leaders.  The  first  to  fall  was  Vladimir 
dementis,  the  leader  of  Slovak  Communist  intellectuals.  As  minister 
of  foreign  affairs  in  the  Prague,  he  fell  into  "discredit"  so  much  that 
in  1952  he  was  purged  from  his  office  and  executed.  Two  years  later 
Gustav  Husak  was  sentenced  to  life  imprisonment,  and  all  of  his 
Communist  fellow  workers  received  10  to  22  years.  Zealous  Com- 
munists though  they  were,  to  date  not  one  of  them  has  received  a  com- 
mutation of  his  sentence  or  "mercy."  Certain  Communist  leaders 
simply,  it  is  alleged,  "shot  themselves"  or  "suddenly  died." 

Mr.  Arens.  Who  has  the  responsible  leadership  in  Slovakia  today  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Neither  the  government  in  Prague  nor  Moscow,  that  is, 
no  responsible  Communist  leader  in  Prague  or  Moscow,  including 
Khrushchev,  trusts  the  Slovaks,  not  even  well-trained  and  Prague-and- 
Moscow-orientated  Slovak  Communists.  This  is  evident  from  the 
fact  that  the  Czech  Communist,  Karol  Bacilek,  the  supreme  secretary 
of  the  Communist  Party,  has  the  highest  position  in  Slovakia.  The 
second  supreme  position  is  held  by  the  Hungarian  Communist  Viliam 
Siroky.  Slovaks  in  the  Communist  administration  have  practically  no 
significant  positions.  The  individuals  who  do  have  those  positions 
are  all  foreign  Communists,  mostly  Czechs.  Besides  this  there  are 
thousands  of  Czech  troops  and  police  in  Slovakia.  The  secret  police 
force  in  Slovakia  is  wholly  in  the  hands  of  Czech  Communists. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  does  the  secret  police  force  work  in  Slovakia? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Already  in  the  spring  of  1945  the  Czech-directed  secret 
police  force,  together  with  the  Soviet  Secret  Police,  operating  in  Slo- 
vakia, seized  some  30,890  hapless  and  innocent  Slovaks  and  unscrupu- 
lously and  cruelly  carried  them  off  to  the  Soviet  Union,  probably  to 
the  concentration  camps  in  Siberia.    In  the  following  years  this  secret 

48405'— 60— pt.  5 8 


12  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

police  force  spent  its  time  ferreting  out  and  suppressing  Slovakia's 
unabating  total  opposition  and  abortive  resistance  movements.  Almost 
every  year  dozens  of  Slovak  patriotic  leaders  from  anti-Communist 
groups  or  movements  in  Slovakia  would  be  arrested,  imprisoned,  or 
secreted  away  to  some  prison  or  concentration  camp,  there  to  suffer, 
die,  or  vanish.  The  secret  police  would  condemn  them  summarily,  not 
only  for  anti-Communist  political  activity,  but  also  for  shielding  their 
church  or  priests,  or  for  defending  and  upholding  or  working  for  a 
free,  self-ruling,  and  independent  Slovakia. 

Thus  in  1946  alone  this  secret  police  force  imprisoned  in  Slovakia 
almost  114,000  Slovaks.  Most  of  these,  after  months  and  years  of 
wasting  away  under  Communist  torment,  were  eventually  released, 
but  generally  ruined  and  broken  of  body  and  spirit,  usually  ill  and 
emaciated  from  prison  or  concentration-camp  brutality,  inhumanity, 
and  starvation ;  thereafter  to  be  continually  suspected,  watched,  and 
hunted  or  persecuted.  The  rest,  never  to  taste  freedom  again,  would 
be  kept  imprisoned  for  months  or  years  even  more  inhumanly,  with- 
out a  proper  or  decent  investigation,  much  less  a  just  trial,  some  miser- 
ably to  perish  forever  from  improper,  indecent,  brutal,  and  inhuman 
treatment  or  malnutrition  and  the  like,  and  the  other  few,  languish- 
ing and  awaiting  trial  or  certain  death,  would  be  summarily,  often 
without  notice,  condemned  and  executed,  sometimes  even  without  any 
public  announcement. 

Not  infrequently  the  secret  police,  with  loaded  arms  in  hand,  would 
swoop  down  upon  and  raid  private  homes  and  apartments  to  terrify 
the  occupants  and  ransack  their  possessions;  or  they  would,  unpro- 
vokedly,  unjustly,  and  without  warrant,  merely  break  into  citizens' 
private  dwellings  and,  terrifying  them  with  their  guns,  search  and 
ransack  the  premises ;  or,  as  it  often  happened,  they  would,  with  guns 
or  bayonets  in  hand,  burst  into  a  church  during  services,  insult  and 
attack  the  officiating  clergyman,  or  even  rudely  lay  hold  of  him  and 
carry  him  off  the  pulpit  during  his  particular  religious  or  liturgical 
service. 

The  tortures,  indecencies,  and  inhumanities  committed  by  these 
secret  police  upon  the  Slovak  people  in  Slovakia  were  the  same,  or 
very  similar,  as  those  advocated  and  recorded  in  the  writings  and 
records  of  the  GPU  and  NKVD. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  any  reports  of  the  present  activity  and 
methods  of  the  secret  police  there  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Yes,  we  do  have.  Just  recently  the  Slovak  National 
Council  Abroad  received  a  trustworthy  report  from  various  Slovak 
political  prisoners  in  Czechoslovakia,  reliably  depicting  the  malcon- 
ditions  and  maltreatment  variously  and  indiscriminately  imposed 
upon  the  hapless  Slovak  political  internees  merely  according  to  the 
particular  suspicions  and  unscrupulous  whims  of  this  police  force. 
For  instance,  an  example  in  point  is  that  of  the  Leopoldov,  one  of  the 
severest  and  cruelest  prisons  and  concentration  camps  to  which  the 
noblest  and  finest  Slovak  opponents  of  communism  were  and  still  are 
sent.    At  present  several  hundred  of  them  are  thus  incarcerated  there. 

Among  the  prisoners  in  Leopoldov  was  Bishop  Jan  Vojtassak,  now 
82.  He  was  ordered  to  strip  completely  and  made  to  stand  on  flagstone 
floors  for  2  hours.  From  time  to  time  they  were  all  forced  to  do 
squatting  exercises.    WTien  the  aged  Bishop  Vojtassak  was  no  longer 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  13 

able  to  keep  up  with  the  exhausting  exercise,  the  cruel  warden  shouted 
at  him  brutally,  "I'll  give  it  to  you  I  So  your  breath  is  running  short  ? 
Get  on  with  the  drill  1  Squat,  jump  I  Get  on,  even  if  it  kills  you  I" 
and  he  cursed  savagely. 

Some  items  of  personal  use  and  value  belonging  to  the  prisoners 
were  heaped  up  in  a  pile,  and  when  one  of  the  unfortunates  complained 
that  it  might  be  difficult  to  find  what  was  his  later  on,  the  guard  com- 
mented cynically,  "And  why  should  you  want  it?  You're  going  to 
rot  and  die  in  this  place,  anyway." 

Most  of  the  prisoners  were  housed  in  solitary  c^lls.  As  soon  as  the 
warden  knocked,  however,  all,  even  those  in  communal  quarters,  had 
to  give  an  immediate  response  by  drilling  squat- jumps  at  once,  squat- 
ting and  rising  at  a  fast  rate  and  counting  in  a  very  loud  voice.  Often 
they  were  required  to  squat- jump  an  average  of  300  times  a  day;  but 
if  the  guard  or  keeper  was  in  a  mean  mood  or  if  a  control  commission 
arrived  from  Prague,  the  requirement  was  raised  to  from  600  to  800 
repetitions.  No  consideration  was  granted  to  the  state  of  health  or  to 
the  age  of  anyone.  Those  who  were  overcome  in  the  course  of  the 
routine  and  blacked  out  were  revived  with  dashes  of  cold  water.  This 
happened  more  than  once  to  Bishop  Michal  Buzalka. 

Guards  or  even  corridor  patrols  chosen  by  the  commandant  from 
among  trusties  (mostly  criminals) ,  for  even  the  slightest  cause  and  by 
their  own  petty  authority,  would  arbitrarily  decree  "punitive  rations" 
or  "hard  bed"  to  a  prisoner  for  at  least  14  days,  sometimes  even  for 
several  weeks.  "Punitive  rations"  meant  that  out  of  his  normal 
rations,  which  were  already  so  miserly  as  to  really  amount  to  starva- 
tion fare,  an  ill-fated  prisoner  would  receive  only  a  scant  half.  "Hard 
bed"  meant  sleeping  on  the  bare  floor. 

Imprisoned  medics  figured  that  normal  week-day  rations  served  to 
the  inmates  provided  from  800  to  1,000  calories  per  day ;  Sunday  serv- 
ings offered  from  1,200  to  1,400  calories — this  in  comparison  with  the 
minimum  of  2,400  calories  which  a  grown  man  doing  no  manual  labor 
requires  in  order  to  maintain  well  being.  Nevertheless,  on  the  average 
one-third  of  the  prisoners  were  usually  assigned  "pimitive  rations." 
There  was  a  fearful  spread  of  anemia,  malnutrition  with  attendant 
swelling  of  the  limbs,  bleeding  gums  generally  inducing  loss  of  teeth 
for  want  of  adequate  vitamins,  etc.  Practically  one  out  of  eveiy  three 
prisoners  was  afflicted  with  at  least  one  of  these  ailments.  Doctors 
were  helpless. 

An  inmate  confined  to  a  normal  cell  was  subjected  to  from  300  to  600 
squat-jumps  a  day,  depending  on  the  temper  of  his  guards.  A  pris- 
oner "in  punishment,"  however,  was  ordered  to  do'more  than  that 
number  of  squat-jumps.  Besides,  in  a  "correction  block,"  they  also 
had  to  race  from  20  to  50  times  a  day  down  the  full  length  of  the  prison 
corridor,  clad  only  in  their  underclothes ;  they  were  apportioned  only 
half-rations  and  had  to  sleep  on  the  bare  concrete  floor.  At  night 
they  were  often  roused  from  sleep,  and  each  time  they  had  to  respond 
to  roll  call  and  do  squat-drills.  Some  prisoners  were  detained  here  as 
long  as  2  or  3  months. 

There  were  fears  that  the  civilian  population  of  the  area  might  come 
to  aid  the  prisoners.  Intimidating  tactics  were  set  in  motion.  From 
watchtowers  shots  were  poured  into  the  cells  of  the  prisoners,  who 
had  to  take  cQver  beneath  their  beds.   The  prisoners  were  not  allowed 


14  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

to  sleep  at  all.  They  had  to  strip  to  their  underclothes,  and  then 
police  dogs  were  driven  into  the  rooms.  No  quarters  were  spared. 
Even  the  prison  infirmary,  where  lay  mortally  sick  prisoners  and 
patients  recovering  from  major  surgery,  was  overrun  by  dogs  that 
raced  about  wildly  from  bed  to  bed  and  on  the  beds.  All  of  them,  of 
course,  were  muzzle- free. 

The  performance  of  divine  services,  as  well  as  the  retaining  or  read- 
ing of  religious  books,  has  been  proscribed  in  all  penal  institutions  ever 
since  1950.  Eosaries,  crucifixes,  and  common  prayer  are  also  for- 
bidden. Even  the  dying  are  denied  the  consolation  of  a  priest,  nor 
may  a  priest  perform  any  fimctions  for  the  dead.  At  Leopoldov  the 
guards  bury  the  dead  in  a  state  field  on  the  other  side  of  the  railroad 
tracks,  not  far  from  the  grim  walls  of  the  prison  camp.  No  mounds 
mark  the  places  of  the  graves ;  they  are  identified  only  by  small  stakes 
each  with  a  number. 

Church  Holy  Days,  especially  Christmas  and  Easter,  are  made  most 
unpleasant  for  the  prisoners.  All  year  long  no  meat  soup  is  served, 
but  it  was  on  Good  Friday  in  1956.  Meat  was  also  servecl  on  Christ- 
mas Eve,  a  day  of  fast  and  abstinence  in  the  Catholic  Church.  On 
that  day  a  surprise  inspection  team  from  the  police  patrols  the  quar- 
ters to  ascertain  that  no  prisoners  are  at  prayer  or  reading  smuggled 
religious  instructions. 

The  prisoners  long  to  receive  the  sacraments.  All  through  the 
records  of  the  hard  years,  there  is  not  even  the  rumor  of  any  defec- 
tion from  the  faith  in  the  prisons.  On  the  contrary,  a  number  of 
unbelievers  have  been  converted. 

Mr.  Arens.  Are  there  labor  concentration  camps  in  Slovakia? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Indeed  there  are.  The  main  ones  are  at  Novaky,  Pre- 
sov,  and  Muceniky.  Quite  a  few  hundred  Slovak  political  internees 
slave  in  Jachymov,  the  well-known  uranium  mine  in  Sudetenland. 
Whilst  mentioning  Sudetenland,  let  me  call  to  your  attention  also  the 
fact  that  when  the  Prague  Czech-Communist  regime  expelled  over 
3  million  Sudeten  Germans,  it  forced  over  400,000  Slovaks  from  Slo- 
vakia to  work  there  with  the  view,  first,  to  Czechize  a  great  portion 
of  the  Slovak  population  and,  second,  to  weaken  the  Slovak  anti- 
Communist  opposition  and  resistance  in  Slovakia. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  are  the  Communists  doing  economically  for  the 
people  ? 

]\Ir.  Pauco.  Deplorably.  Unlike  the  tremendous  prosperity,  the 
high  standard  of  living,  and  the  wonderful  life  and  freedom  which 
so  gloriously  prevailed  during  Slovakia's  short-lived  independence 
under  President  Msgr.  Jozef  Tiso's  leadership,  and  which  the  people 
thoroughly  loved  and  enjoyed,  today  just  the  opposite  exists.  Today 
Slovakia's  economic  life  is  aligned  with,  and  conforms  to,  that  of  the 
Soviet  Union.  It  is  regimented  in  accordance  with  the  whims  of  the 
Czech-Communist  regime  in  Prague.  It  is  thus  that  the  State  began 
one  by  one  the  nationalization  of  everything  and  is  establishing  com- 
plete control  over  everything — public  and  personal,  economic  and  so- 
cial, cultural  and  even  religious  life.  It  has  established  its  own  state 
factories  and  industries;  its  own  utilities  and  commercial  enterprises; 
its  own  state  housing,  hospitals,  and  sanitoria ;  its  own  state-controlled 
medical  and  other  professions,  trades,  and  classes;  its  own  cultural, 
social,  and  recreational,  even  religious,  activities;  its  own  state-owned 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  15 

resources,  forests,  land  and  waters;  and  its  own  state-owned  or  con- 
trolled communal  farms.  Thus  over  70  percent  of  the  farms  in  Slo- 
vakia are  already  communized,  that  is,  reduced  to  the  kolkhoz  system 
and  farming.  The  Prague  Government  is  frantically  buildiiig  in 
Slovakia  arms  and  missile  industries  and  a  great  arsenal  of  atom 
bombs. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  the  Slovak  people  succumb  to,  or  believe  in,  the  peace 
slogan  "peaceful  coexistence"  '^     Does  it  influence  them  ? 

Mr,  Pauco.  Certainly  not  significantly.  I  spoke  with  dozens  of 
Americans  of  Slovak  origin  who  recently  visited  Slovakia  and,  in 
reply  to  this  question,  they  invariably  reiterated  that,  "The  Slovak 
people  are  praying  daily  for  war,  for  they  cannot  see  any  other  way 
out  of  communism  except  through  a  major  war." 

Mr.  Arens.  You  say  that  American  Slovaks  visited  or  visit  Slo- 
vakia.   Were  any  of  them  prominent  American  citizens  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  As  far  as  I  know  there  were  only  two  better  known 
Americans,  two  clergymen,  who  were  able  to  get  in.  The  Prague 
Communist  Regime  refused  to  grant  visas  to  the  others  who  wished  to 
visit  Slovakia. 

^  Mr.  Arens.  How  did  the  Communist  regime  treat  these  American 
visitors  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Since  these  visitors  were  uninfluential  individuals,  they 
suffered  no  harm  and  nothing  significant  happened  to  them.  A  num- 
ber of  them,  however,  did  mention  to  me  that  the  Communist  police 
and  authorities  kept  daily  tab  on  them  and  on  their  comings  and 
goings,  so  that  they  were  afraid  to  speak  openly  or  to  go  everywhere 
that  they  would  have  loved  to  go,  lest  they  involve  their  relatives  or  ' 
even  themselves.  They  did  notice  a  lot  of  official  Communist  anti- 
American  propaganda  over  the  radio  and  through  the  newspapers  in 
Slovakia,  but  the  Slovak  people  there  do  not  seem  to  be  affected  by  it ; 
rather,  they  resent  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  We  know  you  were  in  Vinnitsa.    Is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  Yes,  I  was  there  in  1943  with  the  International  Press 
delegation.  ^  I  may  reiterate  here  that  I  agree  with  the  statements 
of  my  Ukrainian  friends  who  witnessed  the  horrors  in  Vinnitsa.  This 
visit  of  mine  was  my  first  shocking  experience  with  the  terrifying 
brutality  of  the  Soviets :  people  shot  through  the  nape.  I  saw  hun- 
dreds of  women,  miserable  widows  and  orphans,  who  sobbingly  told 
me  of  how  this  horrible  and  shocking  tragedy  was  perpetrated.  The 
merciless  crimes  of  Khrushchev  in  Vinnitsa  are  crying  to  heaven  for 
vengeance. 

Mr.  Arens.  "What  do  you  think  of  Khrushchev's  recent  tactics  ? 

Mr.  Pauco.  They  are  overdone  and  sly.  Communists  have  always 
^one  after  their  objectives  well  thought  out  and  prepared.  Today  it 
isn't  necessary  for  them  to  proclaim  a  worldwide  proletariat  revolu- 
tion, when  so  many  people  amongst  the  Western  nations  seem  to  fancy 
that  there  will  be  some  favorable  internal  changes  in  the  Soviet  regime. 
Khrushchev  shrewdly  casts  about  his  soothing  slogans,  and  we  are 
encouraged  and  satisfied.  The  West  acts  as  if  it  had  discovered  that 
Khrushchev  in  this  war  of  nerves,  which  he  only  prolongs  with  his 
travels  and  visitSj  is  achieving  above  all  that  which  is  most  important 
to  the  Soviet  Union — the  cracking  of  the  backbone  of  the  subjugated 
nations  beliind  the  Iron  Curtain.    Soviet  propaganda  can  now  con- 


16  THE    CRIMES    OF    lOIRUSHCHEV 

tentedly  publicize  that  the  West  is  not  concerned  about  these  subju- 
gated nations  and  that  it  will  not  fight  in  their  behalf,  for  now  the 
West  only  desires  peace  and  compromise  with  Khrushchev. 

Reports  from  Slovakia  indicate  that  the  talks  of  and  with  Khru- 
shchev in  the  United  States  had  equally  as  terrifying  an  effect  on  the 
Slovak  people  in  Slovakia  as  did  the  inaction  of  the  West  in  behalf 
of  the  Hungarian  people  in  the  Hungarian  revolt  of  1956,  or  equally 
as  disgusting  an  effect  on  them  as  the  West's  abandonment  of  the 
Tibetans  last  year  or  of  the  Laos  today.  It  seems  to  me  that  it  is 
time  that  the  civilized  world  took  cognizance  of  the  fact  that  discus- 
sions and  conferences  with  Communists  lead  nowhere  and  are  ulti- 
mately worse  than  useless,  indeed  harmful  to  the  West.  In  my  opinion, 
the  only  way  to  deal  with  communism  is  to  isolate  Communist  regimes 
economically  and  militarily  and,  at  the  opportune  time,  if  need  be  in 
the  moment  of  decision,  to  annihilate  every  Communist  regime. 

The  Chairman.  Thank  you,  Mr.  Pauco. 


The  Chairman.  Call  your  next  witness,  please,  Mr.  Arens. 

Father  Zubek,  do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Father  Zubek.  I  do. 

STATEMENT  OF  FATHER  THEODOEIC  JOSEPH  ZUBEK 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself  by  name,  residence,  and  occu- 
pation. 

Father  Zubek.  My  name  is  Father  Theodoric  Joseph  Zubek.  I  live 
in  Clifton,  N.J.,  at  225  Ackerman  Avenue.  I  am  a  religious  priest, 
Franciscan  priest,  and  presently  a  teacher  of  religion  in  Seton  Hall 
University,  Newark,  N.J. 

Mr.  Arens.  Father,  give  us,  if  you  please,  just  a  word  about  your 
own  personal  background,  including  the  place  of  your  birth  and  a 
word  about  your  education  and  your  early  life. 

Father  Zubek.  I  was  born  in  Slovakia  on  April  4, 1914,  in  the  town 
of  Malacky.    It  is  close  to  Bratislava,  in  western  Slovakia. 

My  studies  consisted  of  elementary  schooling  in  the  same  village  of 
Malacky,  then  the  gymnasium  or  high  school,  in  Bratislava  and  in 
Skalica.  I  graduated  from  that  gymnasium  of  Skalica  on  June  9, 
1934.  I  went  through  my  theological  studies  in  Zagreb,  in  Bratislava 
and  in  Fribourg,  Switzerland.  I  was  ordained  a  Franciscan  priest 
on  June  20,  1938.  I  finished  my  postgraduate  theological  studies  in 
October  1940,  with  a  doctorate  of  theology.  I  was  a  teacher  of 
theology  in  the  Franciscan  seminary  in  Zilina,  Slovakia,  from  1941 
to  1950,  when  the  Communists  suppressed  all  the  monasteries  in 
Slovakia. 

Mr.  xVrens.  Please  give  us  in  your  own  words  just  a  thumbnail 
description  of  what  happened  in  your  own  personal  life  when  the 
Communists  suppressed  the  religious  orders  m  Slovakia. 

Father  Zubek.  The  suppression  of  the  monasteries  and  all  religi- 
ous oi-ders  came  unexpectedly.  They  came  to  our  monasteries  during 
the  night  of  April  13,  forced  entrance,  gave  us  5  minutes  to  collect  our 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  17 

personal  belongings,  then  put  us  into  trucks  and  took  us  to  an  unknown 
place.  This  place  for  us  Franciscan  religious  priests  and  brothers  was 
Svaty  Benedik  nad  Hronom. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  happened  then  ? 

Father  Zubek.  In  those  monasteries,  called  concentration  monas- 
teries, they  tried  to  reeducate  us  as  pro-Communist  priests. 

Mr.  Aeens.  What  do  you  mean  by  reeducate  ? 

Father  Zubek.  By  reeducation,  I  mean  they  gave  us  brainwash- 
ing. In  the  morning  and  in  the  evening  there  was  always  at  least 
a  short  lecture  about  communism.  Tliey  brought  in  Communist 
newspapers,  such  as  Pravcla — this  means  truth,  but  it  was  all  lies — 
and  we  had  to  read  editorials  in  it  and  take  part  in  those  discus- 
sions, led  by  a  pro-Communist  president  or  chief  of  the  camp. 

Then,  they  gave  us  a  condition.  After  the  reeducation,  they  de- 
manded the  oath  of  loyalty  to  the  Communist  regime,  as  the  condi- 
tion to  reentering  the  public  ministry. 

Mr.  Arexs.  Did  you  take  the  loyalty  oath  ? 

Father  Zubek.  I  did  not,  because  I  considered  it  something  against 
my  priestly  conscience. 

I  was  looking  immediately  for  a  way  to  escape.  We  were  working 
in  the  vineyards,  and  that  particular  vineyard  in  which  we  were 
working  was  close  to  a  forest.  I  figured  out  how  to  get  into  the 
forest  and  disappear.  After  one  week  I  realized  those  plans  and 
escaped.  This  was  in  April  1950,  and  I  went  into  hiding  from  that 
time  on. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  in  hiding  ? 

Father  Zubek.  I  was  in  hiding  for  9  months^ 

Mr.  Arens.  Then  where  did  you  go  ? 

Father  Zubek.  Then  I  went  secretly  over  the  border  to  Austria. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  long  were  you  in  Austria  i 

Father  Zubek.  I  was  in  Austria  for  3  months,  and  then  I  came  to 
Italy.  I  was  called  by  my  religious  superiors  in  Eome  to  the  central 
office  there,  to  give  an  account  of  the  situation  concerning  religious 
matters  in  Slovakia. 

I  applied  immediately  for  an  American  visa  when  I  was  in  Rome, 
and  it  was  granted  in  1952.  I  came  to  this  country  on  February  21, 
1952. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Father,  by  devices. which  we  have  discussed  off  the 
record,  you  have  current  sources  of  information  respecting  the  situa- 
tion in  your  former  homeland  of  Slovakia ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Father  Zubek.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Arens.  "Wlien  did  the  persecution  of  the  church  in  Slovakia 
begin  ? 

Father  Zubek.  The  persecution  of  the  church  in  Slovakia  began 
with  the  restoration  of  Czechoslovakia  in  the  form  of  the  so-called 
People's  Democracy,  in  1945.  In  that  year  all  schools  were  national- 
ized ;  no  private  schools,  that  is,  Catholic,  were  permitted.  Catholic 
periodicals  were  for  the  most  part  suppressed.  Church  properties  in 
excess  of  35  acres  were  expropriated.  Many  priests  and  three  Slovak 
bishops  were  imprisoned  by  the  new  regime.  The  whole  structure 
of  the  new  Czechoslovakia  was  anti-Catholic.  But  in  1946  and  1947, 
the  church  in  Slovakia  recovered  somehow  from  these  first  blows. 
The  real  trouble,  a  systematic  persecution  of  the  church,  began  when, 


18  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

in  February  1948,  the  Communists  seized  complete  power  in  Czecho- 
slovakia. 

Mr,  Arens.  Wliat  happened  to  the  church  organization  in  1948? 

Father  Zubek,  After  the  overthrow  in  1948,  the  church  was  taken 
under  complete  control  by  the  Communist  regime.  First  of  all,  all 
Catholic  periodicals  and  publishing  houses,  reestablished  in  1946-47, 
were  suppressed.  There  were  over  20  Catholic  periodicals  and  8 
publishing  houses  in  Slovakia.  Only  one  publishing  house,  the 
Society  of  St.  Adalbert,  was  left  to  continue  under  its  old,  historic 
name.  But  even  that  one  was  immediately  put  under  complete  Com- 
munist control  and  forced  to  serve  Communist  aims.  It  is  currently 
publishing  the  Katolicke  Noviny  (Catholic  News),  a  weekly,  and  the 
Duchovny  Pastier  (Spiritual  Shepherd),  a  monthly  for  the  clergy, 
both  edited  in  the  pro-Communist  spirit. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why  did  the  Communists  let  the  Society  of  St, 
Adalbert  exist  ? 

Father  Zubek.  I  think  that  it  was  for  propaganda  purposes.  Since 
its  foundation  in  1870,  the  Society  of  St.  Adalbert  was  deeply  en- 
rooted in  the  Catholic  life  of  Slovakia.  The  suppression  of  this 
publishing  house  would  have  been  too  much  for  Slovak  Catholics  to 
swallow.  Then,  the  Communists  impudently  pretend  to  be  bene- 
factors of  the  church.  They  try  to  keep  up  appearances  of  religious 
freedom.  According  to  the  Soviet  pattern,  the  Communists  of 
Czechoslovakia  put  into  their  new  constitution  of  May  9,  1949,  a 
paragraph  about  religious  freedom.  They  did  not  close  any  church. 
They  permitted  the  publication  of  the  two  aforementioned,  so-called 
Catholic  periodicals  and  occasionally  some  books,  such  as  a  daily 
missal  in  Slovak,  or  the  Holy  Bible.  But  they  are  doing  it  only  to 
boast  that  no  harm  to  the  church  is  being  done.  Actually,  whatever 
they  left  of  the  church  organization  is  under  strict  Communist  con- 
trol and  must  serve  the  Communist  regime. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  there  other  instances  of  Communist  encroach- 
ments against  the  church  ? 

Father  Zubek.  There  certainly  were,  and  very  many.  To  proceed 
chronologically,  I  have  to  mention,  first  of  all,  the  suppression  of  all 
Catholic  societies,  reestablished  in  1946  and  1947.  No  exception,  not 
even  to  preserve  appearances,  was  made  at  this  time. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  some  Catholic  societies  permitted  later? 

Father  Zubek.  Not  exactly.  But  there  was  something  which 
should  eventually  be  qualified  so.  It  was  on  June  10,  1949,  when  the 
Communists  of  Czechoslovakia  tried  to  establish  a  Catholic  pro- 
Communist  organization  under  the  name  of  the  "Catholic  Action." 
The  genuine  Catholic  Action  was  suppressed  in  1948.  A  year  later, 
the  Communists  gathered  in  Prague  about  800  lay  people  and  70 
priests  who  proclaimed  themselves  to  be  representatives  of  the  Catholic 
Church  in  Czechoslovakia.  They  established  the  so-called  reborn 
Catholic  Action,  whose  pui-pose  was  to  reinstate  good  relations  be- 
tween the  church  and  state,  after  the  official  discussions  about  the 
agreement  between  the  church  and  state  failed  in  March,  1949. 
^  The  bishops  protested  vehemently  against  this  spurious  organiza- 
tion, qualifying  it  an  attempted  schism,  and  prohibited  Catholics 
from  having  anything  to  do  with  it.  Also,  the  Holy  See  on  June  20, 
1949,  issued  a  decree  excommunicating  all  organizers,  promoters,  and 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  19 

members  of  this  organization.  Despite  the  opposition  of  the  hier- 
archy, clergy,  and  faithful,  the  Communists  still  insisted  on  imposing 
their  "Catholic  Action"  upon  the  Catholics,  which  resulted  in  a  great 
turmoil  throughout  the  whole  of  Slovakia.  Slovakia  during  the  sum- 
mer of  1949  was  on  the  verge  of  open  rebellion.  Hundreds  of  people 
and  priests  were  imprisoned  in  this  connection. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  the  Slovak  clergy  in  strong  opposition  to  com- 
mmiism  ? 

Father  Zubek.  It  is  quite  natural  that  the  Slovak  clergy,  knowing 
the  atheistic  and  antireligious  nature  of  communism,  was  strongly 
opposed  to  it.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Communists  were  fully  aware 
that  the  Catholic  people  of  Slovakia,  traditionally  influenced  by  the 
clergy,  were  also  opposed  to  coimnunism  as  long  as  the  influence  of 
the  clergy  persisted.  That  was  the  reason  why  since  1948  they  started 
to  disrupt  the  ties  between  the  clergy  and  the  lay  people,  and  to  dis- 
turb the  unity  of  the  clergy  itself.  First  of  all,  they  began  to  press 
the  bishops  to  conclude  an  agi-eement  between  the  church  and  the 
Communist  government.  The  agreement  was  never  concluded.  The 
negotiations  collapsed  on  March  22j  1949,  because  the  Communists 
simply  wanted  the  bishops'  ratification  of  the  Communist  encroach- 
ments upon  the  rights  of  the  church  and  rejected  all  the  rightful 
demands  of  the  hierarchy  to  guarantee  the  basic  rights  of  the  church. 

Meanwhile,  the  Commmiists  tried  to  get  some  priests  to  their  side. 
Those  members  of  the  clergy  who  showed  signs  of  submission  were 
praised  in  the  Communist  press  as  good  "patriotic  priests,"  though, 
m  fact,  most  of  them  were  rather  mentally  disturbed  persons,  at  odds  • 
with  their  bishops  and  superiors.  These  priests  assisted  in  the  estab- 
lishment of  the  so-called  "Catholic  Action^'  on  June  10, 1959,  and  sub- 
sequently yielded  to  further  Communist  demands.  But  the  bulk  of 
the  Catholic  clergy  remamed  loyal  to  their  bishops  and  to  the  Holy 
See,  and  was  for  a  long  time  openly  opposed  to  Communist  pressure. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  the  opposition  of  the  clergy  lessen  ? 

Father  Zubek.  To  some  extent,  yes.  The  reason  was  that  the  Com- 
munists, after  the  failure  of  the  discussions  for  an  agreement  between 
the  church  and  state  and  of  their  spurious  "Catholic  Action,"  in- 
creased their  efforts  in  dissolving  the  church  organization.  The 
critical  step  in  this  direction  was  the  new  antichurch  laws  of  October 
14, 1949. 

By  Law  No.  217,  all  religious  matters  were  put  under  complete 
control  of  the  newly  established  State  Bureau  for  Ecclesiastical  Af- 
fairs. All  priests  in  public  ministry  were  bound  to  take  the  oath 
of  loyalty  to  the  Communist. regime.  For  any  religious  activity,  the 
approval  of  the  Bureau  was  required.  No  assignment  to  any  religious 
office  was  possible  without  previous  approval  of  this  department. 

By  Law  No.  218,  after  all  church  properties  had  been  nationalized, 
the  government  took  over  the  economic  safeguarding  of  the  clergy 
and  the  maintenance  of  church  buildings.  The  trick  of  this  law  was 
that  economically  all  priests  were  put  at  tlie  mercy  of  the  State  Bu- 
reau for  Ecclesiastical  Affairs.  The  salaried  priests  became  state  em- 
ployees. Tlie  bishops  protested  against  these  antichurch  laws.  But 
to  prevent  further  damage  to  the  priests  and  to  the  church  organiza- 
tion, they  permitted  their  priests  to  take  the  oath  and  the  salary, 
with  the  restriction  that  they  do  not  assume  any  obligation  which 


20  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

would  be  against  Divine  and  Ecclesiastical  laws  or  against  tlieir 
priestly  conscience, 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  all  the  priests  take  the  oath  of  loyalty  ? 

Father  Zubek.^  Most  of  the  priests  did.  Those  who  did  not  were 
deposed  from  their  posts,  and  most  of  them  were  imprisoned.  The 
bishops  first  refused  to  take  the  oath.  Three  of  the  ten  Slovak  bish- 
ops were  imprisoned,  and  on  January  15,  1961,  two  of  them  were 
sentenced  to  life  imprisonment  and  one  to  a  24-year  term.  The  re- 
maining bishops  were  confined  to  their  residences  and  prevented  from 
the  administration  of  their  dioceses.  Additionally,  three  other  Slo- 
vak bishops  were  imprisoned.  Andrej  Skrabik,  bishop  of  Banska 
Bystrica,  died  on  January  8,  1950,  and  a  "patriotic  priest"  by  the 
name  of  Jan  Dechet  was  appointed  by  the  Communist  Bureau  for 
Ecclesiastical  Affairs  as  the  administrator  of  the  diocese.  This  gross 
infringement  brought  about  the  delicate  problem  of  church  jurisdic- 
tion. The  situation  in  the  Banska  Bystrica  diocese  became  quite 
confused,  and  a  dreadful  precedent  was  set  up  for  dioceses  where 
the  bishop  was  imprisoned.  To  prevent  a  repetition  of  the  case  of 
Banska  Bystrica,  and  to  save  the  church  organization  as  much  as 
possible,  three  bishops  consented  to  take  the  oath,  on  March  12,  1951. 

Mr.  Arens.  Did  the  religious  situation  in  Slovakia  change  with 
the  taking  of  the  loyalty  oath  by  the  bishops  ? 

Father  Zubek.  To  some  extent,  it  did.  In  general,  the  open  re- 
sistance of  the  salaried  clergy  to  the  regime  lessened.  But  it  does 
not  mean  that  the  salaried  priests  all  became  collaborators  with  the 
Communist  regime,  or  pro-Communists  priests  and  bishops.  The 
original  number  of  collaborators  from  the  ranks  of  the  clergy,  about 
50  all  together,  hardly  increased.  The  only  difference  was  that  the 
collaborators  became  much  bolder  and,  under  Communist  pressure, 
received  quite  important  assignments  in  the  church  administration. 
Some  were  elected  by  diocesan  chapters  of  Canons  as  administrators 
of  dioceses  and  vicars  capitularies;  others  were  appointed  as  vicars 
general  or  directors  of  chancery  offices.  The  Communist-sponsored  ac- 
tivities of  the  salaried  clergy  are  carried  on  mostly  under  the  title 
of  "Clergy  Committees  for  Furtherance  of  Peace."  All  bishops 
and  priests  who  are  not  in  prison  must  take  part  in  such  activities. 
They  have  to  preach  according  to  the  themes  prepared  for  them  by 
the  State  Bureau  for  Ecclesiastical  Affairs  and  delivered  to  them 
through  the  chanceries. 

Mr.  Arens.  Were  there  other  important  antichurch  measures  taken 
by  the  Communist  government  ? 

Father  Zubek.  Certainly,  there  were.  One  of  tliem  was  the  sup- 
pression of  all  monasteries  and  convents.  Male  religious  orders  and 
congregations  were  suppressed  in  April  1950,  There  were  over  TOO 
male  religious  priests  and  brothers  living  in  137  monasteries  in 
Slovakia.  They  were  taken  forcibly  to  so-called  concentration  mon- 
asteries and  were  subjected  to  Communist-sponsored  reeducation.  If 
they  complied  with  this  brainwashing  and  took  the  oath  of  loyalty, 
they  were  sent  to  parishes  and  churches  as  diocesan  priests.  If  they 
remained  unyielding,  they  were  sent  to  forced  labor  camps^  and 
later,  in  1957,  released  to  manual  work.  Clerics  and  religious 
brothers,  if  they  did  not  want  to  leave  the  religious  life,  went  also 
through  the  forced  labor  camps,  and  eventually  to  manual  work  on 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  21 

their  own.  A  similar  fate  met  the  female  religious  congregations. 
There  were  3,548  religious  sisters  in  Slovakia,  living  in  210  convents. 
The  convents  were  suppressed  in  August,  1950,  and  the  sisters  were 
forced  to  leave  the  religious  life.  If  they  refused,  they  were  sent 
to  work  without  any  salary  in  forced  labor  camps,  collective  farms, 
or  various  state  plants. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  happened  to  the  Uniates  ? 

Father  Zubek.  They  encountered  the  most  pitiful  fate.  On  April 
28,  1950,  they  were  officially  put  out  of  existence.  Similar  to  the 
meeting  that  the  Communists  staged  for  the  establishment  of  the  so- 
called  "Catholic  Action,"  they  organized  a  gathering  for  the  return  of 
the  Uniates  to  the  Orthodox  Church.  Under  the  Communist  sponsor- 
ship, 820  delegates  with  a  hundred  of  Byzantine-rite  priests  met  at 
Presov  and,  purportedly  as  representatives  of  Slovak  and  Ruthenian 
Uniates,  proclaimed  the  secession  from  Rome  and  the  return  to  the 
Orthodox  Church.  Both  Byzantine-rite  bishops,  Peter  Go j die  and  his 
auxiliary  Basil  Hopko,  rejected  the  proposal  to  join  the  schism  and 
were  immediately  imprisoned.  There  were  320,000  Uniates  with  319 
priests  in  Slovakia. 

Mr,  Arens.  Are  new  priests  being  ordained  in  Communist  Slo- 
vakia ? 

Father  Zubek.  Hardly  any.  All  the  seminaries  were  suppressed  in 
1950.  All  four  religious  seminaries  were  suppressed,  together  with 
religious  orders  and  congregations.  The  diocesan  seminaries,  five  in 
number,  were  suppressed  in  August,  1950.  Only  one  seminary,  that 
connected  with  the  University  of  Bratislava,  was  reopened  for  the 
fall  semester  of  1950.  But  the  faculty  was  completely  changed,  the 
unyielding  professors  of  theology  dismissed,  and  new,  pro-Communist 
teachers,  including  a  lay  expert  on  dialectic  materialism,  were  ap- 
pointed by  the  State  Bureau  for  Ecclesiastical  Affairs.  The  num- 
ber of  seminarians  is  very  small,  about  40  altogether.  Ordinarily, 
8  to  10  theologians  per  year  are  ordained  in  the  new  seminary  for  the 
priesthood. 

Mr.  Arens.  Has  the  persecution  of  the  Catholic  Church  been  mod- 
erated since  Khrushchev's  ascension  to  power  ? 

Father  Zubek.  On  the  contrary,  in  the  last  2  years  the  Com- 
munists, particularly  in  Slovakia,  strengthened  their  efforts  to  elimi- 
nate religion  from  the  lives  of  the  populace.  Antireligious  courses, 
expositions,  and  publications  have  increased  considerably.  The  anti- 
religious  fight  is  considered  of  the  utmost  importance,  particularly 
in  Slovakia,  where  religion  is  deep-rooted  and  still  has  a  positive  in- 
fluence upon  the  anti-Communist  stand  of  the  majority  of  the  popu- 
lace. 

Mr,  Arens.  Did  these  last  Communist  efforts  have  any  results? 

Father  Zubek.  No,  according  to  all  indications.  Always  new 
anti-Communists  are  being  imprisoned  in  Slovakia.  And  those  im- 
prisoned and  sentenced  in  many  instances  are  not  political  opponents 
in  a  strict  sense.  Many  Slovaks  were  imprisoned  and  sentenced  ex- 
clusively for  religious  reasons.  Among  them  were  members  of  the 
genuine  Catholic  Action  existing  in  the  underground.  There  were 
young  men  imprisoned  and  indicted  for  secretly  studying  theology 
for  the  priesthood.  There  were  members  of  a  secretly  founded  insti- 
tution, living  as  religious  brothers.    There  were  groups  of  defendants 


22  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

whose  supposed  crime  was  that  they  tried  secretly  to  continue  in  their 
religious  life,  banned  in  1950.  One  group  is  liquidated,  but  new  ones 
spread  out.  It  is  clear  that  even  nowadays  the  church  is  rejuvenated 
with  her  own  blood.  Today,  as  it  w  as  in  the  early  church,  the  blood 
of  martyrs  is  the  seed  of  new  Christians. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  do  the  Communists  maintain  this  strict  control 
of  the  fragments  of  your  church  which  remain  in  your  former  home- 
land of  Slovakia  ? 

Father  Zubek.  The  Communist  control  can  be  said  to  be  twofold : 
public  control  and  secret  control  of  activities  of  the  church.  By 
public  control,  I  mean  the  antichurch  law^s  of  1949,  discussed  previ- 
ously. 

Besides,  they  have  secret  control  of  the  church.  Spies  attend 
every  ceremony.  They  trail  priests  and  bishops  w^herever  they  go. 
I  had  some  experience  along  that  line  myself.  I  was  trailed  before 
the  monasteries  were  suppressed.  I  saw  people  shadow^ing  me  in  those 
last  months.  I  w^as  also  a  superior  of  a  monastery.  Each  individual 
priest  did  not  experience  this,  but  I,  being  the  head  of  a  monastery, 
was  held  responsible  for  all  proceedings  in  the  monastery,  and  when- 
ever I  left  the  door  of  the  monastery  I  always  had  someone  shadowing 
me. 

The  matter  of  spying  on  sermons  I  also  know  about  positively,  from 
personal  experience.  One  spy  came  to  me  and  asked  about  the  topic 
of  my  sermon,  because  he  had  fallen  asleep  during  the  mass  in  which 
he  was  supposed  to  listen  to  my  sermon. 

It  is  a  matter  of  general  procedure  that  the  Communists  have  their 
spying  system  for  all  strata  of  the  populace.  In  every  apartment 
building  there  is  at  least  one  spy  for  every  few  apartments.  In  small 
houses,  there  is  at  least  one  person  who  is  spying  on  the  people.  What 
I  would  stress  is,  particularly  for  priests,  for  monasteries,  there  was 
not  one  but  many  spies  looking  and  going  around,  and  it  was  not  a 
matter  of  one  individual  case,  but  it  was  something  completely  uni- 
versal and  general  to  our  country  from  the  beginning,  since  1948. 
And  I  am  quite  sure  it  stays  the  same  way;  that  even  now  there  is 
strict  control  and  surveillance  by  Communist  agents  of  all  individual 
bishops  and  priests  who  still  enjoy  some  kind  of  freedom,  namely, 
those  who  are  not  in  prison.  They  are  not  really  free,  that  is,  but  they 
are  at  least  not  in  prison,  although  under  strict  control  and 
surveillance. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  information  respecting  Bishop  Vojtassak? 

Father  Zubek.  I  knew  Bishop  Vojtassak  when  he  was  a  free  man. 
He  was  quite  a  strong  personality  and  very  much  outspoken  in  his  op- 
position to  communism.  After  he  was  taken  prisoner  in  1950  and  then 
tried  in  January  1951, 1  listened  every  day  to  his  testimony  as  it  was 
being  broadcast  on  the  air,  in  one  of  those  monster  processes  they 
had,  and  his  voice  was  almost  unrecognizable.  The  whole  testimony 
that  he  gave  was  so  pitiful  that  I  must  say  it  was  a  completely  different 
man  completely  than  I  previously  knew  him  to  be.  I  assume,  there- 
fore, that  they  used  some  very  special  methods  of  their  own  to  destroy 
his  personality  so  that  he  would  testify  in  such  a  way  that  he  showed 
himself  as  a  weak  man  unable  to  defend  himself. 

Mr.  Arens.  For  the  purpose  of  this  record,  tell  us  just  a  word  about 
Bisliop  Vojtassak,  who  he  is  and  what  happened  to  him,  a  word  about 
his  case,  please. 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  23 

Father  Zubek.  Bishop  Vojtassak  is  the  residential  bishop  of  the 
Spis  Diocese.  He  was  very  active  in  cultural  matters  of  Slovakia  as 
well  as  in  his  religious  work.  He  was  considered  one  of  the  best  and 
most  beloved  bishops  of  Slovakia.  He  had  difficulties  with  the  new 
Czechoslovakian  pro-Communist  regime  immediately,  beginning  in 
1945,  when  he  expressed  his  opposition  to  the  new  regime,  and  he  was 
for  seven  months  in  prison  at  that  time  in  1945.  Then  he  was  released, 
and  he  continued  his  work  as  bishop  of  the  diocese ;  but  in  1948,  when 
the  Communists  took  over,  he  must  have  been  under  Communist  sur- 
veillance quite  strictly,  because  in  the  common  bishops'  meetings  he  did 
not  take  part.  His  signature  does  not  appear  on  several  of  the  com- 
mon statements  by  other  bishops,  so  I  assume  that  since  1948  he  was 
put  aside  by  the  Communists.  But  he  was  still  not  imprisoned  until 
the  summer  of  1950,  and  in  1951  he  was  sentenced  to  24  years  of 
imprisonment. 

Mr.  Akens.  What  was  the  offense  charged  against  him  ? 

Father  Zubek.  It  was  a  made-up  offense  charged  by  the  Com- 
munists, the  usual  thing :  treason,  sabotage,  espionage  for  American 
imperialists,  and  similar  charges,  completely  without  any  grounds, 
without  any  foundation. 

Mr.  Arens.  Father,  based  upon  your  firsthand  observations  and 
experience  with  communism  in  action,  as  distinct  from  the  communism 
that  is  portrayed  by  its  propagandists  and  apologists,  can  the  free 
world  coexist  with  communism? 

Father  Zubek.  No,  sir.  They  have  proved  so  many  times  that  they 
are  completely  unreliable,  that  for  them  the  end  is  the  good  of  the 
Communist  Party,  and  behind  it,  world  domination  is  what  they  have 
in  their  minds.  For  that  purpose,  they  would  do  anything.  If  the  cold 
war  does  not  achieve  it,  then  they  will  use  other  tricks.  One  of  these 
tricks,  I  think,  is  the  "coexistence"  that  they  are  propagandizing  now. 
But  coexistence  in  their  minds,  as  I  know  the  Communist  structure, 
Communist  trickery,  means  that  they  want  to  take  over  through  in- 
filtration and  through  cheating  other  people,  putting  them  into  a 
kind  of  sleep  or  napping.  Appeasement  is  what  they  want  on  the  part 
of  America,  and  through  that  appeasement  they  hope  to  achieve  their 
aims,  which  they  were  unable  to  achieve  through  the  cold  war.  That 
is  my  opinion.  I  don't  think  there  can  be  any  ^ood  result  from  the 
free  world  going  along  the  lines  of  Communist  propaganda  for 
coexistence. 

The  Chairman.  We  thank  you  very  much,  Father  Zubek. 


Mr.  Ajrens.  The  next  witnesses  will  be  Messrs.  ICotta  and  Pipa. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  solemnly  swear,  Mr.  Kotta  and  Mr.  Pipa, 
that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole 
truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Kotta.  I  do. 

Mr.  Pipa.  I  do. 

STATEMENTS  OE  NUCI  KOTTA  AND  ARSHI  PIPA 

Mr.  Arens.  Kindly  identify  yourself,  Mr.  Kotta,  by  name,  residence, 
and  occuj)ation. 


24  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

Mr.  KoTTA.  My  name  is  Nuci  Kotta.  I  live  at  304  West  106th  Street, 
New  York  City,  and  I  am  presently  deputy  secretary  general  of  the 
Assembly  of  Captive  European  Nations. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us,  if  you  will,  please,  sir,  a  brief  sketch  of  your 
personal  life  and  background. 

Mr.  KoiTA.  I  am  an  Albanian  exile,  and  was  born  in  Albania.  I 
left  my  country  in  1938  to  go  to  study  in  Paris.  In  1939  Albania  was 
invaded  by  the  Italian  Fascists,  and  I  have  not  returned  there  since. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  just  a  word,  if  you  please,  about  your  profes- 
sional career. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  I  have  a  degree  of  doctor  of  laws  from  the  University 
of  Paris.  I  have  taught  Albanian  at  the  National  School  of  Spoken 
Oriental  Languages  of  the  University  of  Paris.  In  19-19  I  became  a 
member  of  the  National  Committee  for  a  Free  Albania.  I  was  a 
member  of  that  committee  until  1953.  Since  1955  I  have  been  the 
deputy  secretary  general  of  the  Assembly  of  Captive  European 
Nations. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  Mr.  Pipa,  would  you  in  like  manner  give  us  a  word 
of  identification  of  yourself :  Your  residence,  occupation,  and  a  brief 
resume  of  your  personal  background. 

Mr.  Pipa.  I  was  born  in  Albania  in  1920.  I  am  a  graduate  of  the 
University  of  Florence,  with  the  degree  of  doctor  in  philosophy.  I 
have  in  the  past  been  a  teacher  of  philosophy  in  Albania.  I  have 
edited  an  Albanian  literary  review,  and  have  published  a  book  of 
poems  and  other  writings. 

The  regime  in  Tirana  arrested  me  because  of  my  critical  attitude 
towards  communism,  which  I  did  not  accept.  As  a  result,  I  spent 
10  years  in  various  prisons  and  slave  labor  camps  in  Albania.  After 
being  released  from  prison,  I  escaped  into  Yugoslavia,  and  in  1958 
I  came  to  the  United  States  as  a  permanent  resident. 

Mr.  Arens.  Now,  gentlemen,  may  I  suggest  as  I  pose  a  question 
to  you,  that  either  of  you  respond  as  you  think  appropriate;  or,  after 
one  of  you  has  spoken  on  a  particular  subject,  the  other  may  amplify 
his  comments. 

First  of  all,  may  I  ask,  for  the  purpose  of  clarification  of  the  record, 
a  word  about  Albania  itself.  Please  tell  us  where  it  is  located  and 
any  strategic  significance  it  has  in  the  power  struggle  in  the  world, 
and  any  other  items  of  information  of  like  character. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Albania  is  situated  in  the  Balkan  Peninsula  on  the 
Adriatic  shore.  Its  area  is  of  about  12,000  square  miles,  and  the  popu- 
lation is  1,500,000,  not  to  mention  a  minority  of  about  1,000,000  Al- 
banians in  Yugoslavia. 

The  strategic  importance  of  Albania  resides  mainly  in  the  fact  that 
the  Bay  of  Valona,  which  has  been  transformed  by  the  Soviet  Union 
into  a  powerful  submarine  base,  would  enable  the  Soviet  Union,  in 
case  of  war,  to  imperil  allied  navigation  all  over  the  Mediterranean. 
The  Mediterranean  is  very  important  to  the  West  because  it  is  the  lane 
through  which  logistical  support  can  go  to  the  very  sensitive  southern 
flank  of  NATO,  constituted  of  Greece  and  Turkey. 

The  southern  flank  of  NATO  is  very  dangerous  for  the  Soviet 
Union,  because  the  center,  Baku,  which  produces  most  of  the  oil  in 
the  Soviet  Union,  is  less  than  2O0  miles  from  the  easternmost  part 
of  Turkey;  and  if  it  were  to  be  occupied  by  the  Allies,  in  case  of 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  25 

war,  the  Soviet  Union  -would  be  unable  to  continue  the  pursuit  of 
the  war.  This  is  why  the  Soviets  consider  that  it  is  most  important 
to  neutralize  the  southern  flank  of  NATO.  This  is  why  they  have 
built  their  submarme  base  in  Valona,  in  order  to  render  impossible  the 
logistical  support  of  Turkey  and  Greece  in  case  of  war. 

Mr.  Arens.  Gentlemen,  will  you  kindly  give  us  a  brief  history 
of  the  political  control  of  Albania  in  the  course  of  the  last  several 
years? 

Mr.  PiPA.  Albania  won  its  independence  in  1912,  and  remained  in- 
dependent until  1939,  when  it  was  invaded  by  Fascist  Italy.  In  1943, 
the  Nazi  army  occupied  our  territory. 

Albania  was  liberated  in  1944.  A  large  part  of  the  forces  of  liber- 
ation were  composed  of  patriotic  Albanians  who  had  been  artfully 
deceived  by  Communist  leaders  into  following  them.  There  were  also 
several  nationalist  groups  and  parties  during  the  war,  but  the  Com- 
munists managed  to  bring  them  down  with  their  terroristic  methods 
and  with  the  effective  help  of  the  Yugoslav  Communists.  As  a  result, 
communism  came  into  power  in  Albania,  and,  from  that  time,  until 
now,  has  been  ruling  Albania  so  as  communism  rules,  i.e.  through 
methods  which  are  unacceptable  to  the  free  world,  and  to  freedom- 
loving  people  throughout  the  world. 

It  is  because  of  such  terroristic  methods  that  the  Albanian  people, 
although  in  overwhelming  majority  opposed  to  communism,  have  not 
been  able  yet  to  overthrow  its  regime.  The  opposition  has  been  par- 
ticularly strong  among  the  peasants  and  the  intellectuals.  The  peas- 
antry hate  the  collectivization  policy  of  the  regime.  As  for  the 
intellectual  class,  its  opposition  has  been  repressed  with  a  seldom 
paralleled  ferocity. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Pipa,  there  recently  left  these  sliores  the  head  of 
the  international  Communist  apparatus,  Nikita  Klirushchev,  who 
was  portrayed  by  the  highest  of  our  officialdom  in  this  country  as  a 
friendly,  genial  man,  a  family  man,  who  would  be  deserving  of  all 
the  amenities  accorded  a  representative  of  the  friendliest  power. 
Have  you  had  any  occasion  to  experience  the  impact  of  Khrushchev's 
international  Communist  apparatus  in  your  own  life  during  the 
period  of  your  residency  in  Albania  ? 

Mr.  Pipa.  Durmg  the  greatest  part  of  my  imprisonment,  the  Alba- 
nian Communist  regime  had  been  characterized  by  the  terrorism  of 
Stalin.  I  might  describe  the  situation  after  my  release  from  prison. 
I  lived  in  Albania  under  Khrushchev's  rule  for  nearly  a  year  and  a 
half.  I  can,  therefore,  testify  about  it.  My  opinion  is  that  Albania 
is  now  living  under  the  same  political  climate  as  that  of  Stalin.  The 
best  evidence  of  this  is  that  the  system  of  political  jorisons  and  forced 
labor  camps  is  the  same  as  before.  A  total,  estimated  from  12,000  to 
14,000  people,  still  live  in  slavery  in  such  places. 

Mr.  Arens.  In  the  recent  past  we  have  seen  articles  by  certain 
columnists  and  others  who  have  journeyed  to  Moscow,  to  the  effect 
that  Khrushchev  is  becoming  more  benign  and  is  eliminating  the 
terror  mechanisms  which  prevailed  during  Stalin's  regime.  Would 
you  care,  on  the  basis  of  firsthand  knowledge,  to  comment  on  that? 

Mr.  Pipa.  Others  may  think  about  Khrushchev  as  they  like.  I  per- 
sonally think  that  he  is  just  the  faithful  disciple  of  Stalin.  His 
methods  are  not  essentially  different  from  those  of  his  predecessor. 
The  Beria  case  may  serve  as  an  example.    Hungary  is  another. 


26  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

As  for  Albania,  I  could  testify  that  the  forced  collectivization  pol- 
icy has  been  pursued  under  the  Khrushchev  period  with  still  more 
vigor  than  it  was  under  the  Stalin  regime. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  I  would  like  to  give  some  details  on 
that. 

By  1953  the  Communist  regime,  in  the  person  of  Premier  Shehu, 
had  admitted  that  collectivization  in  Albania  had  been  a  failure, 
inasmuch  as  94  percent  of  the  agricultural  output  was  produced  by 
individual  farmers. 

Collectivization  in  Albania  started  in  earnest  in  1955 ;  that  is,  when 
Khrushchev  was  in  the  saddle  in  Russia.  It  was  pursued  very 
energetically,  and  by  1956,  30  percent  of  the  arable  land  was  col- 
lectivized, and  the  goal  of  the  five-year  plan  which  is  to  end  next  year, 
in  1960,  is  to  collectivize  over  80  percent  of  the  land.  The  Communist 
statistics  now  say  that  about  75  percent  of  the  arable  land  is  collec- 
tivized. The  often  proclaimed  ultimate  objective  is  the  collectiviza- 
tion of  100  percent  of  the  land. 

If  you  consider  that  the  peasant — and  I  would  say  maybe  even 
more  so  a  peasant  of  a  mountainous  country — sticks  to  his  land,  does 
not  want  to  abandon  it,  to  give  up  his  land.  We  have  the  example 
of  Poland  after  the  events  of  the  Hungarian  revolution  in  October 
1956,  where  as  soon  as  the  peasants  were  free,  they  abandoned  their 
collective  farms  and  took  up  farming  for  themselves.  If  you  consider 
that,  then  you  must  admit  that  these  collectivization  activities  are  the 
best  proof  of  the  fact  that  there  is  in  Albania,  since  Khrushchev  has 
been  in  power  in  the  Soviet  Union,  no  liberalization  of  the  regime  as 
has  been  claimed. 

Mr.  PiPA.  I  have  seen  indications  of  this  fact  myself,  I  was  living 
in  my  hometown  Shkoder  (Scutari)  in  September  1957,  when  Premier 
Shehu  came  personally  to  that  town  to  exert  pressure  upon  the  peas- 
ants of  the  Shkoder  district  to  enter  the  collective  farms.  Shehu  went 
to  a  village  near  Shkoder,  gathered  the  peasants,  and  threatened  that, 
were  they  not  to  accept  collectivization,  they  would  be  considered 
traitors  to  the  country  and  dealt  with  accordingly.  After  that,  most 
of  the  peasants  entered  the  village  collective  farm.  It  is  only  by  such 
methocls  that  communism  has  managed  to  collectivize  the  free  Al- 
banian peasantry. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  If  I  may  interject,  Mr.  Arens,  I  think  that  Mr.  Pipa 
might  be  in  a  position  to  give  additional  information  about  the  ter- 
roristic measures  used  by  tlie  Communists  to  enforce  collectivization 
and  also  about  life  in  the  collectivized  farms. 

Mr.  Arens.  Could  you  give  us  a  word  on  that,  please,  sir,  from  your 
own  personal  experience,  Mr.  Pipa  ? 

Mr.  PirA.  The  prisons  and  the  labor  camps  were,  to  the  day  I  left 
Albania,  full  of  peasants  who  have  opposed  collectivization.  The  in- 
surrection of  the  peasantry  in  Postriba  in  1946  can  prove  this.  Many 
peasants  were  massacred  on  that  occasion,  and  many  others  have  sub- 
sequently suffered  death  after  various  attempts,  individually  or  in 
groups,  to  resist  collectivization.  As  a  fresh  specimen  of  this  resist- 
ance I  could  relate  the  case  of  two  Albanian  escapees  whom  I  met  in 
Yugoslavia.  Tliey  told  me  that  they  hated  to  live  in  collective  farms, 
and  that  "they  preferred  death  to  such  a  life."  When  I  asked  them 
what  about  all  this  horror  of  collectivization,  they  explained  to  me 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  27 

that  collectivization  implies  slavery.  In  collective  farms  one  cannot 
work  for  himself,  he  must  work  for  the  state,  just  as  a  salaried  worker; 
moreover,  one  is  deprived  of  familiar  intimacy  and  is  not  allowed  to 
worship. 

Mr.  Arens.  Is  Albania  coexisting  now  with  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  In  Albania  we  have  the  typical  coexistence  of  tlie  op- 
pressor with  the  oppressed.  As  the  other  captive  countries,  Albania 
IS,  for  all  practical  purposes,  a  colony  of  the  Soviet  Union.  The 
Communist-imposed  constitution  is  patterned  upon  that  of  the  fed- 
erated republics  of  the  Soviet  Union.  The  laws  are  patterned  upon 
those  of  the  Soviet  Union.  Because  of  the  resistance  of  the  Albanian 
people  to  the  regime,  however,  the  penal  code  is  even  harsher  than  its 
Soviet  model.  Following  that  code,  adopted  in  1952,  the  age  for 
penal  responsibility  for  political  crimes  begins  at  12.  A  boy  or  a  girl, 
a  child  of  12  could  be  sent  to  prison  for  crimes  against  the  state. 
Last  December  the  age  was  changed  to  14^  but  I  doubt  whether  in 
practice  this  would  make  much  difference. 

Mr.  Arens.  What  would  be  the  nature  of  a  crime  against  the  state 
for  which  they  could  send  a  boy  of  12  to  prison  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Anything,  practically.  The  judges  who  sit  on  trials  are 
called  the  people  s  judges,  and  they  have  practically  everything  in 
their  power.  They  can  do  whatever  they  want.  They  are  not  profes- 
sional judges. 

The  lawyers  themselves  are  forced  to  be,  as  the  Minister  of  Justice 
said — and  I  could  perhaps  give  you  the  date  of  this — accessories  of 
Communist  justice;  they  are  forced  to  help  the  prosecution.  Not  only 
this,  but  also  they  are  obliged  to  tell  whatever  secrets  they  have 
learned  from  the  accused,  to  the  prosecutor.  The  basic  aim  of  the 
Communist  criminal  legislation  is  to  "protect"  the  so-called  People's 
Democratic  State  and  to  destroy  the  enemies  of  the  regime.  As  a 
result,  according  to  conservative  estimates  based  on  reports  by  es- 
capees— the  Communists,  of  course,  do  not  publish  statistics  of  their 
crimes — about  10,000  people  have  been  killed  with  or  without  trial, 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  suppose  Khrushchev,  this  benign,  friendly  man, 
as  he  is  portrayed  by  certain  of  our  officialdom,  would  countenance 
sending  to  the  penitentiaiy  for  political  crimes  children  only  12  years 
of  age  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  The  penal  code  was  adopted  in  1952.  With  the  ex- 
ception of  the  amendment  of  December  1958  which  I  just  mentioned,  it 
has  remained  unchanged.  It  has  not  been  abrogated.  And  now, 
Mr.  Khrushchev,  this  benign  man,  as  you  have  called  him,  is  the 
master  in  Albania ;  and  since  this  penal  code  has  not  been  repealed, 
then  you  must  assume  that  he  would  send  children  to  prison. 

Mr,  Arens.  Were  reports  of  Khrushchev's  visit  here  and  the  state- 
ments made  about  him  disseminated  in  Albania  to  these  people  who 
are  in  this  slave  state? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Very  much  so. 

Mr.  Arens.  I  would  like  to  read  you  a  quotation  from  the  Washing- 
ton Evening  Star  of  September  28, 1959,  as  follows  : 

Describing  the  meeting  of  Premier  Khrushchev  with  the 
Eisenhower  grandchildren  at  his  Gettysburg  farm,  the  Presi- 
dent said  it  w^as  a  *'heart-warming  scene"  of  the  sort  that  all 
Americans  would  enjoy. 


28  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

Assuming  that  this  public  statement  is  disseminated  behind  the  Iron 
Curtain  to  the  people  who  are  held  in  subjugation  by  Khrushchev's 
terror  apparatus,  what  will  be  their  reaction  to  this  type  of  official 
statement  by  the  head  of  the  government  of  the  free  world? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Undoubtedly  it  will  be  a  blow  to  their  morale.  I  would 
like  to  add  to  this  that,  as  a  general  rule,  any  meeting  of  a  Soviet 
ruler  with  a  Western  leader  would  be  a  blow  to  the  morale  of  the 
captive  peoples  unless  this  Western  leader  raises,  at  that  meeting,  the 
question  of  the  restoration  of  freedom  and  independence  to  the  cap- 
tive nations  and  presses  for  an  equitable  solution  of  this  grave 
problem. 

]\Ir.  PiPA.  I  would  say  that  they  would  be  shocked  at  hearing  it. 

:Mr.  Arens.  Why  ? 

Mr.  PrPA.  Because,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  family  life  in  Albania — I 
refer  to  family  as  the  ethical  institution  which  has  been  so  strongly 
respected  before  communism's  advent — is  being  systematically  de- 
stroyed. When  Albanians  see,  for  instance,  that  sons  are  being 
trained  to  spy  on  their  own  parents,  they  would  be  much  perplexed  at 
the  presentation  of  a  person,  who  is  to  them  the  incarnation  of  evil,  as 
a  good  family  man. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  information  respecting  economic  exploita- 
tion of  Albania  under  Khrushchev's  Communist  apparatus  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Yes.  In  this  respect,  I  may  state  the  following.  Since 
the  Communists  came  into  power  and  particularly  since  Khrushchev 
gained  control  in  the  Kremlin,  there  has  been  an  acceleration  of 
the  drive  toward  industrialization  of  Albania.  Before  World  War 
II,  Albania  was  mainly  an  agricultural  country,  with  very  little  indus- 
try. Adding  more  industry  to  an  agricultural  country  is  not  a  bad 
thing  in  itself,  provided  it  serves  the  interests  of  the  people.  But 
this  is  not  the  case  in  Albania  now  under  communism,  because  the 
industrialization  of  Albania  means  practically  just  the  mining  of  cop- 
per and  chromium  ore. 

By  the  way,  in  Albania  are  the  richest  deposits  of  chromium  ore 
in  eastern  Europe,  jDroducing  over  7  percent  of  the  entire  output  of 
the  Communist-dominated  world. 

This  chromium  ore,  and  copper  and  other  minerals,  as  well  as  oil, 
are  extracted  in  Albania  and  sent  to  the  Soviet  Union,  which  buys 
them  at  ridiculous  prices.  The  investments  for  this  industrialization, 
so-called,  of  Albania  are  so  much  greater  than  the  investments  for  the 
agriculture  that,  as  a  result,  Albania  is  not  in  a  position  now  to  pro- 
duce enough  food  for  its  own  people.  In  addition,  the  presence  of  a 
very  large  num])er  of  Soviet  agents  of  all  sorts,  who  enjoy  a  standard 
of  living  well  above  not  only  that  of  the  people,  but  even  of  the  Al- 
banian Communists,  is  a  heavy  burden  on  the  Albanian  economy. 
Also  a  relatively  very  large  army — which  the  regime  maintains  in 
order  to  have  youth  under  control — deprives  the  agriculture  of  a  much 
needed  manpower. 

That  is  why,  until  2  years  ago,  there  was  rationing  in  Albania; 
and  now,  even  though  the  ration  tickets  have  been  abandoned,  the 
diet  of  the  Albanian  people  is  still  a  starvation  diet. 

Mr.  Arens.  Do  you  have  information  as  to  whether  or  not  there  is 
freedom  of  religion  in  Albania  under  Khrushchev's  regime  ? 

Mr.  PirA.  Religion  has  never  been  free  in  Albania  since  communism 
came  into  power,  and  the  situation  is  still  the  same  at  present.    Al- 


THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV  29 

though  the  Communist  rulers  have  many  times  stated  that  there  is 
freedom  of  religion  in  Albania,  the  major  fact  is  that  the  persons  who 
are  the  heads  of  the  various  Albanian  churches  are  people  chosen  by 
the  government  and  not  by  the  Albanian  people.  Everybody  knows 
that  communism  is  an  atheistic  doctrine  which  is  opposed  to  any  form 
of  religious  faith.  The  Communist  leaders  do  not  make  any  secret  of 
the  fact  that  communism  is  trying  to  wipe  out  any  vestige  of  former 
religious  education.  It  is,  therefore,  contradictory  to  assert  any  free- 
dom of  religion  on  such  premises. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  May  I  interrupt  ?  I  have  some  figures  about  the  perse- 
cution of  the  Catholic  clergy  in  Albania  which  are  very  interesting. 

Mr.  Arens.  Would  you  kindly  proceed  to  present  them  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  At  the  end  of  1950,  out  of  93  Albanian  Catholic  priests, 
17  had  been  executed,  39  had  been  imprisoned,  and  many  of  these  have 
since  died  in  prison  or  concentration  camps. 

Mr.  PiPA.  I  could  testify  to  that.  I  would  like  to  mention  here  in 
particular  the  case  of  Msgr.  Prennushi,  who  was  my  roommate  at  the 
Durres  (Durazzo)  prison.  I  have  been  told  by  him  about  the  tor- 
tures he  underwent  at  the  security  section  of  Durres.  I  have  wit- 
nessed myself  his  being  offended  and  even  tortured  during  his  im- 
prisonment. In  the  same  prison  of  Durres,  after  horrible  tortures,' 
the  head  of  the  Moslem  Church  of  Durres,  Mustafa  Varoshi,  died. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  Eleven  have  been  drafted  into  the  army  as  ordinary 
soldiers,  10  have  died,  and  3  have  escaped  into  the  free  world.  Only  13 
still  remain  free. 

Out  of  94  monks,  Franciscans  and  Jesuits,  16  have  been  executed,  31 
expelled,  35  imprisoned,  6  have  died,  and  6  were  in  hiding. 

Mr.  Arens.  Wliat  is  the  source  of  this  information  ? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  The  source  of  my  information  is  the  Albanian  priests 
who  have  escaped  from  Albania. 

The  Archbishop,  head  of  the  Albanian  Catholic  Church,  Monsei- 
gneur  Vincenc  Prennushi,  died  in  prison.  Bishop  Volaj  was  shot 
and  Archbishop  Gjoni  was  shot. 

The  nuns  were  expelled  from  their  convents.  All  church  properties, 
of  course,  have  been  confiscated. 

Catholic  institutions  in  1945,  when  the  Communists  took  over,  were 
as  f ollow^s :  253  churches  and  chapels,  2  seminaries,  10  monasteries,  20 
convents,  15  orphanages  and  asylums,  16  church  schools,  and  10  chari- 
table institutions.  In  1953,  only  100  churches  and  chapels  and  2  mon- 
asteries were  still  open.    All  the  other  institutions  have  been  closed. 

The  printing  presses  belonging  to  the  church  and  the  seven  periodi- 
cals published  by  the  church,  have  been  suppressed. 

The  drive  against  the  Catholic  Church  still  continues,  and  many  of 
the  remaining  churches  have  been  closed  or  transformed  into  recrea- 
tional halls  for  the  party.  The  seminaries  are  closed,  as  there  are  not 
enough  priests  alive  or  free.  Many  Catholics  have  little  opportunity 
now  to  practice  their  religion. 

The  Moslem  and  Orthodox  churches,  although  perhaps  less  severely 
suppressed,  have  not  fared  much  better.  They  have  been  deprived  of 
their  rightful  leaders  who  have  been  replaced  by  subservient  tools  of 
the  regime.    The  faithful  may  lose  their  jobs  if  they  frequent  the 


30  THE    CRIMES    OF   KHRUSHCHEV 

cliurclies.  And  when  one  loses  liis  job  in  the  captive  nations,  this 
often  means  that  he  loses  the  right  to  work  as  well. 

Mr.  Arens.  May  I  inquire,  if  there  were  a  free  election  tomorrow 
in  Albania,  would  the  Communists  receive  the  majority  of  the  votes? 

]\Ir.  PiPA.  I  would  say  that  they  never  would  receive  a  majority  of 
the  votes  in  Albania  if  there  were  free  elections.  I  know  personally 
that  all  strata  of  the  j)eople  are  opposed  to  communism.  They  cannot 
make  an  insurrection  to  throw  down  communism,  however,  because 
the  regime  is  so  atrocious,  so  terroristic,  that  they  cannot  dare  to 
attempt  it. 

Mr,  KoTTA.  That  is  true  today.  However,  it  was  not  so  until  re- 
cently. After  the  Cominform  expelled  Tito  in  1948,  Albania  ceased 
to  have  common  borders  with  the  rest  of  the  Soviet  empire  and  the 
Albanians  could  have  overthrown  the  Communist  regime  by  them- 
selves. The  main  conditions  for  a  successful  revolt  were  there :  dis- 
content of  the  overwhelming  majority  of  the  population  and  armed 
resistance  in  the  mountains.  All  that  was  needed  was  some  material 
support  and  a  Western  guaranty  of  the  independence  and  territorial 
integrity  of  the  country.  Unfortunately,  these  were  not  given  and, 
after  the  so-called  Warsaw  Pact  and  the  repression  of  the  Hungarian 
revolution,  the  opportunity  was  lost. 

Mr.  Arens^  Gentlemen,  policies  seem  to  be  prevailing  in  the  free 
world  which  presuppose  that  we  are  engaged  in  a  popularity  con- 
test with  a  competing  economic  system,  and  that  we  can  win  this 
struggle  with  the  international  Communist  empire  if  we  just  under- 
stand each  other  a  little  better,  and  that  we  develop  an  understanding 
by  exchanging  art  work,  motion  pictures,  displays,  fairs,  and  the  like. 
Based  upon  your  experience  with  communism  in  reality  as  distinct 
from  the  fiction  which  is  current,  what  observation  do  you  care  to 
make  on  this  approach  to  the  struggle  with  communism  ? 

Mr.  PiPA.  ]Mr.  Arens,  I  would  like  to  say  that  I  do  not  believe  in  tlie 
sincerity  of  Communists  preaching  about  a  mutual  interchange  in 
cultural  relations.  Were  such  an  interchange  to  take  place,  commu- 
nism would  lose  thereof  considerable.  The  atmosphere  propitious  to 
communism  is  one  of  secrecy  and  conspiracy,  of  underhand  methods 
and  of  hidden  truth.  If  the  curtain  were  removed — which  would  cer- 
tainly happen  in  case  of  free  cultural  interchange — the  hideous  picture 
that  would  reveal  itself  to  the  astonished  eyes  of  the  free  world  would 
raise  indignation  and  anger;  communism  would  not  have  any  benefit 
from  it. 

Mr.  Akens.  Why,  then,  if  the  Communists  do  not  like  cultural  ex- 
change, have  they  entered  into  arrangements  whereby  tliey  displayed 
here  in  Washington,  the  seat  of  our  Government,  tlie  motion  picture 
"The  Cranes  Are  Flying."'  They  were  sold  out  downtown  on  "The 
Cranes  Are  Flying."  Seats  were  at  a  premium  to  see  this  production 
of  the  Communist  regime. 

Mr.  KoTTA.  They  do  not  mind  sending  pictures  which  spread  prop- 
aganda for  the  Communist  regime. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  would  this  picture,  or  how  would  their  fair  in 
New  York  City,  or  any  of  these  cultural  exchanges,  benefit  the  Soviet 
regime  ? 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  31 

Mr.  KoTTA.  The  Communist  fraud  in  the  whole  program  is  that  it 
purports  to  identify  in  the  minds  of  the  free  world  the  Communist 
regime  and  the  people  whom  they  hold  in  bondage.  You  do  not  see  in 
any  of  these  cultural  exchanges,  in  their  fairs,  in  their  motion  pictures, 
in  their  art  work  which  they  send  over  here,  in  their  ballets,  any  refer- 
ence at  all  to  the  terror  mechanism  of  the  machinery  which  holds  in 
bondage  the  millions  of  people  that  the  Communists  have  subjugated. 
You  see  displayed  a  little  culture,  which  may  or  may  not  contain  Com- 
munist propaganda  as  such.  But  the  fallacy  of  the  whole  program  is 
that  it  tends  to  convey  to  the  minds  of  the  free  world  the  concept  that 
the  so-called  struggle  between  the  free  world  and  the  Communist 
world  is  a  struggle  between  peoples  as  such,  that  is,  between  the  Rus- 
sian people  and  the  American  people,  rather  than  between  a  deadly 
Communist  world  apparatus  and  the  remaining  free  people. 

May  I  say  further,  as  we  mention  peaceful  coexistence  and  peace- 
ful competition,  that  the  Soviet  rulers  have  always  made  it  clear  that 
they  wanted  to  conquer  the  world.  Lenin  said  that,  and  Stalin  said  it 
after  him.  Then  Krushchev  said  it,  and  he  added  that  the  Commmiists 
are  going  to  renounce  their  goal  when  "a  shrimp  learns  to  whistle." 

Now  Mr.  Khrushchev  says,  "Let's  forget  about  the  cold  war.  I 
want  peaceful  coexistence."  But  not  long  ago,  at  Novosibirsk  on 
October  10,  shortly  after  his  visit  to  the  United  States,  Khrushchev 
defined  coexistence  like  this : 

Coexistence  means  continuation  of  the  struggle  between  the 
two  social  systems — but  by  peaceful  means,  without  war, 
without  interference  by  one  state  in  the  internal  affairs  of 
another.  We  consider  it  to  be  economic,  political,  and  ideo- 
logical struggle,  but  not  military. 

Now,  the  very  phrase  of  "cold  war"  has  become  an  anathema  to  the 
West,  thanks  to  the  Soviet  propaganda ;  but  this  peaceful  coexistence, 
as  defuied  by  Mr.  Khrushchev,  is  nothing  but  cold  war  at  its  worst. 

Wliat  the  Kremlin  wants  is  to  lull  the  West  into  complacency.  They 
are  trying  to  get  the  West  to  recognize  the  status  quo,  so  that  they  may 
finally  succeed  in  convincing  the  captive  peoples  throughout  the  Com- 
munist empire  that  it  is  useless  to  resist  them,  because  they  consider 
that  the  resistance  of  the  captive  nations  to  communism  is  one  of  the 
major  deterrents  to  their  plans  of  world  conquest. 

This  is  what  the  peaceful  coexistence  launched  by  Mr.  Khrushchev 
means. 

Mr.  PiPA.  The  Kremlin's  pretense  of  peace  is  all  a  falsity.  Com- 
munism is  characterized  by  the  most  unscrupulous  machiavellism ; 
they  are  quite  different  things  what  Communists  say  and  what  they  do. 
I  might  say  here  good  words,  beautiful  words,  about  something  which 
is  in  reality  bad.  That  is  what  the  Communists  are  doing.  People 
who  do  not  know  them  well,  people  who  do  not  have  the  marks  of  their 
violence  on  their  bodies,  may  be  deceived  by  their  propaganda.  A 
wise  policy,  however,  should  remedy  it. 

Mr.  Arens.  Mr.  Pipa,  can  you  now,  on  this  record,  recount,  while 
you  are  still  under  oath,  from  your  own  experiences,  what  commu- 
nism in  action  means  in  reality,  as  distinct  from  what  Khrushchev  says 
and  has  said  here  in  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  PiPA.  In  reality,  communism  means  the  system  of  prisons  and 
slave  labor  camps.    It  means  the  repression  of  freedom  of  press,  of 


32  THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV 

freedom  of  gathering,  of  freedom  of  worship,  and,  in  general,  of  what 
are  called  civil  rights  and  human  rights. 

Mr.  Arens.  Tell  us  a  word  about  your  own  experiences  in  the  slave 
labor  camps  as  a  captive  of  Khrushchev's  Communist  apparatus. 

Mr.  PiPA.  I  would  like  to  tell  you  something  particular  in  this 
regard.  For  the  ten  years  of  imprisonment  I  experienced,  I  was  not 
allowed  to  have  books  to  read  in  prison,  except  official  literature.  This 
fact  of  repression  of  cultural  freedom  remained  unchanged,  under 
Stalin's  regime  as  well  as  under  Khrushchev's  rule.  It  would  take 
too  much  time  to  speak  here  about  my  experience  of  prisons  and  labor 
camps — this  might  be  found  in  my  writings.  Suffice  it  to  say  liere 
that  during  my  captivity  I  was  always  living  under  the  terror  of  the 
possibility  of  immediate  death ;  death  by  torture  and  starvation,  death 
by  illnesses  contracted  in  horrible  jails,  death  by  inhuman  labor  con- 
ditions in  camps. 

Mr.  Arens.  Was  physical  torture  inflicted  upon  you,  sir  ? 

Mr.  PiPA.  YeSj  sir. 

Mr.  Arens.  Give  us  a  word  about  that. 

Mr.  PiPA.  When  I  was  arrested,  I  was  beaten  so  savagely  that  I 
lost  consciousness. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why  were  you  beaten  savagely  ? 

Mr.  PiPA.  Because  they  wanted  me  to  confess  things  that  were  not 
true. 

Mr.  Arens.  How  did  they  beat  you?  With  what  type  of  instru- 
ments ? 

Mr.  PiPA.  With  several  types  of  instruments :  a  piece  of  wood,  the 
butt  of  a  gun,  whips ;  I  was  boxed,  and  kicked,  and  trampled  on.  As 
a  consequence,  I  could  not  speak  for  a  month.  Beating,  however,  is 
far  from  being  the  worst  kind  of  torture  in  Communist  Albania,  and 
I  should  be  glad  to  have  come  out  alive;  my  brother,  for  instance,  died 
while  being  tortured. 

Mr.  Arens.  Khrushchev  has  described  the  Communists  as  hu- 
manitarians.    Is  that  consistent  with  what  you  are  relating? 

Mr.  PiPA.  If  you  call  such  things  humanitarian,  I  would  agree 
with  him. 

Mr.  Arens.  Can  the  free  world  believe  Khrushchev's  professions  of 
peaceful  intent? 

Mr,  KoTTA.  At  its  own  risk.  If  the  West  were  to  believe  the  pro- 
fessions of  peace  and  friendship  of  Khrushchev  and  be  lulled  into  com- 
placency, the  Soviet  Union  would  succeed  in  gaining  further  foot- 
holds, and  would  at  some  time  be  so  strong  that  it  would  either  by 
military  means  or  otherwise  crush  the  free  world. 

]Mr.  Arens.  Can  the  free  world  trust  Khrushchev  in  any  interna- 
tional summit  conferences? 

Mr.  KoTTA.  No. 

Mr.  PiPA.  Certainly  not. 

Mr.  Arens.  Why  not? 

]SIr.  PiPA.  An  international  conference  is  regarded  by  Communists 
as  just  another  weapon  in  the  cold  war.  The  world  should  not  be- 
lieve what  they  say  in  conferences,  because  it  is  the  dominant  feature 
of  Communists  to  deny  with  actions  what  they  say  in  words.  It  has 
been  proved  so  many  times  during  the  history  of  communism  that 
only  naive  people,  not  enough  enlightened,  may  believe  it. 


THE    CRIMES    OF    KHRUSHCHEV  33 

Mr.  KoTTA.  If  my  memory  does  not  betray  me,  a  committee  of  the 
American  Congress  has  established  that  the  Soviet  Union  has  vioLated 
some  thousand  treaties  with  other  countries.  If  the  Soviet  Union  has 
violated  a  thousand  treaties,  how  can  you  believe  that  the  Soviet 
Union  will  respect  any  treaties  which  it  might  enter  into  with  the  free 
world  in  the  future  ? 

The  Chairman.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Kotta  and  Mr.  Pipa. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:30  p.m.,  the  consultations  were  concluded.) 


INDEX 


Individuals 

Page 

Bacilek,    Karol 10,  11 

Benes,  Eduard 1,  lo 

Beria    (Lavrenti) 2") 

Buzalka,  Michal  (Bishop) 13 

dementis,  Vladimir 11 

Dechet,    Jan 20 

Eisenhower   (Dwight  D.) 27 

Frecer 9 

Gjoni  (Marina)    (Arclibishop) 20 

Gojdic,  Peter  (Bishop) 21 

Gottwald    (Klement) 8 

Hopko,  Basil   (Bishop) 21 

Husak,  Gustav 11 

Kanak 9 

Klirnshchev,    Nikita 1-5,  8,  11,  15,  10,  21,  25-28,  31,  32 

Klucik 9 

Kotta,  Niici 4,  23-33   (statement) 

Lenin   (V.  I.) 31 

Martinka    (Reverend) 9 

Milan    (Reverend) 9 

Nemec,  John  (Rev.) 9. 

Pauco,  Joseph 1.2,7-1(5  (statement) 

Pipa,  Arshi 4,5,23-33  (statement) 

Prennushi,  P.  Vincenc  (Msgr.) 20 

Salat,  Anthony  (Rev.) 9 

Seda    (Reverend) 9 

Shehu    (Mehmet) 4,  20 

Sindler 9 

Siroky,  Viliam 11 

Skrabik,    Andrej 20 

Slamen,  Francis 9 

Stalin  (Josef) 5,  25,  20,  81,  32 

Staudinger 9 

Svoboda    (Ludwig) 1,  10 

Tiso,    Jozef 2,   10,    14 

Tito  (Josip  Broz) ^^ 30 

Tuka,  Vojtech   (Bela) 11 

Turanec 9 

Varoshi,    Mustafa 29 

Vojtassak,  Jan  (Bishop) 12,  22,  23 

Volaj    (Bishop) 29 

Zubek,  Theodoric  Joseph 3,  10-23  (statement) 

Zverin 9 

Organizations 

Assembly  of  Captive  European  Nations 4,  24 

Catholic  Action  (Slovakia) 18,  19,  21 

Clergy  Committees  for  Furtherance  of  Peace    (Slovakia) 20 

Communist  Party,  Slovakia 11 

i 


11  INDEX 

Concentration  Camps :  Slovakia :  Page 

Jachymov 2, 14 

Leopoldov 12, 14 

Muceniliy 2, 14 

Novaky 2,14 

Presov 2, 14 

Slovenska  Lupca 9 

National  Committee  for  a  Free  Albania _        24 

North  Atlantic  Treaty  Organization  (NATO) 24,  25 

Slovak  Democratic  Party 11 

Slovak  National  Council  Abroad 1,  7,  12 

Slovakia,  Government  of : 

Secret  Police 11,  12 

State  Bureau  for  Ecclesiastical  Affairs 19,  20 

Society  of  St.  Adalbert  (Slovakia) 18 

University  of  Bratislava    (Slovakia) 21 

Publications 

Cranes  Are  Flying,  The  (motion  picture) 30 

Duchovny  Pastier   (The   Spirtual  Shepherd) -  18 

Jednota  (weekly) 7 

Katolicke  Noviny    (Catholic  News) 18 

Prace    (newspaper) 8 

o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 

3  9999  05445  3145 


Boston  Public  Library 

Central  Library,  Copley  Square 

Division  of 
Reference  and  Research  Services 


The  Date  Due  Card  in  the  pocket  indi- 
cates the  date  on  or  before  which  this 
book  should  be  returned  to  the  Library. 

Please  do  not  remove  cards  from  this 
pocket.